Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
A Multicenter Assessment of the Sensitivity and Specificity for a Single High-Sensitivity Cardiac Troponin Test at Emergency Department Presentation for Hospital Admission.
Kavsak, Peter A; McRae, Andrew; Vatanpour, Shabnam; Ismail, Ola Z; Worster, Andrew.
Afiliação
  • Kavsak PA; Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada; kavsakp@mcmaster.ca.
  • McRae A; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
  • Vatanpour S; Department of Emergency Medicine, University of Calgary, Calgary, Alberta.
  • Ismail OZ; Departments of Pathology and Molecular Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
  • Worster A; Division of Emergency Medicine, McMaster University, Hamilton, Canada.
J Appl Lab Med ; 4(2): 170-179, 2019 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31639662
BACKGROUND: Studies have illustrated how a low or undetectable high-sensitivity cardiac troponin (hs-cTn) concentration at emergency department (ED) presentation can rule out myocardial infarction (MI). A problem with using an undetectable hs-cTn cutoff is that this value may be defined differently among hospitals and is also difficult to monitor. In the present study, we assess the diagnostic performance of a clinical chemistry score (CCS) vs hs-cTn alone in the presentation blood sample in the ED for patient hospital admission in a multicenter setting. METHODS: From January 1 to June 30, 2018, consecutive patients with random glucose, creatinine (for an estimated glomerular filtration rate calculation), and hs-cTnI (Abbott, 2 hospitals, Hamilton, Ontario, n = 10496) or hs-cTnT (Roche, 4 hospitals, Calgary, Alberta, n = 25177) were assessed for hospital admission with the CCS (range of scores, 0-5) or hs-cTn alone. Sensitivity, specificity, predicative values, and likelihood ratios were calculated for a CCS of 0 and 5 and for hs-cTn alone (hs-cTnI cutoffs, 5 and 26 ng/L; hs-cTnT cutoffs, 6 and 14 ng/L). RESULTS: The CCS of 0 (CCS <1) identified approximately 10% of all patients as low risk and had a sensitivity for hospital admission of nearly 98% as compared to <93% when hs-cTnT (<6 ng/L) or hs-cTnI (<5 ng/L) cutoffs alone were used. A CCS ≥5 had a specificity for hospital admission >95%, with approximately 14% of patients at high risk. CONCLUSIONS: An ED disposition (admit or send home) using the presentation blood sample could occur in nearly 25% of all patients by use of the CCS.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Admissão do Paciente / Troponina / Análise Química do Sangue / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Admissão do Paciente / Troponina / Análise Química do Sangue / Serviço Hospitalar de Emergência / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article