Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effect of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function - An updated systematic review with meta-analysis and meta-regression.
Pincombe, Nick L; Pearson, Melissa J; Smart, Neil A; King, Nicola; Dieberg, Gudrun.
Afiliação
  • Pincombe NL; School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
  • Pearson MJ; School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
  • Smart NA; School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia.
  • King N; School of Biomedical Sciences, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Plymouth, Drake's Circus, Plymouth, PL4 8AA, UK.
  • Dieberg G; School of Science and Technology, University of New England, Armidale, NSW 2351, Australia. Electronic address: gdieberg@une.edu.au.
Nutr Metab Cardiovasc Dis ; 29(12): 1261-1272, 2019 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31653512
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Atherogenesis and endothelial dysfunction contribute to cardiovascular risk and vitamin D has been implemented in endothelial repair. This systematic review, meta-analysis and meta-regression aims to establish the effect of vitamin D supplementation on endothelial function. METHODS AND

RESULTS:

To conduct the systematic review we searched the Cochrane Library of Controlled Trials, PubMed, ProQuest and EMBASE for randomized controlled trials that investigated the effects of vitamin D supplementation on flow-mediated dilation (FMD%), pulse wave velocity (PWV), and central augmentation index (AIx). Meta-analysis was based on a random effects model and inverse-variance methods to calculate either mean difference (MD) or standardized mean difference (SMD) as effects sizes. This was followed by meta-regression investigating the effect of baseline vitamin D concentrations, vitamin D dosing and study duration. Risk of bias was assessed using the JADAD scale and funnel plots. We identified 1056 studies of which 26 studies met inclusion criteria for quantitative analysis. Forty-two percent of the 2808 participants had either deficient or insufficient levels of vitamin D. FMD% (MD 1.17% (95% CI -0.20, 2.54), p = 0.095), PWV (SMD -0.09 m/s (95% CI -0.24, 0.07), p = 0.275) and AIx (SMD 0.05% (95% CI -0.1, 0.19), p = 0.52) showed no improvement with vitamin D supplementation. Sub-analysis and meta-regression revealed a tendency for AIx and FMD% to increase as weekly vitamin doses increased; no other significant relationships were identified.

CONCLUSIONS:

Vitamin D supplementation showed no improvement in endothelial function. More evidence is required before recommendations for management of endothelial dysfunction can be made.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasodilatação / Vitamina D / Deficiência de Vitamina D / Endotélio Vascular / Suplementos Nutricionais / Aterosclerose Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Eixos temáticos: Pesquisa_clinica Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Vasodilatação / Vitamina D / Deficiência de Vitamina D / Endotélio Vascular / Suplementos Nutricionais / Aterosclerose Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article