Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The use of prophylactic intra-aortic balloon pump in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting.
Nakamura, Ken; Hamasaki, Azumi; Uchida, Tetsuro; Kobayashi, Kimihiro; Sho, Ri; Kim, Cholsu; Uchino, Hideaki; Shimanuki, Takao; Sadahiro, Mitsuaki.
Afiliação
  • Nakamura K; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihonkai General Hospital, Sakata, Japan.
  • Hamasaki A; Second Department of Surgery, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
  • Uchida T; Second Department of Surgery, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
  • Kobayashi K; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihonkai General Hospital, Sakata, Japan.
  • Sho R; Department of Public Health, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
  • Kim C; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihonkai General Hospital, Sakata, Japan.
  • Uchino H; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihonkai General Hospital, Sakata, Japan.
  • Shimanuki T; Division of Cardiovascular Surgery, Nihonkai General Hospital, Sakata, Japan.
  • Sadahiro M; Second Department of Surgery, Yamagata University Faculty of Medicine, Yamagata, Japan.
PLoS One ; 14(10): e0224273, 2019.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31658283
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Intra-aortic balloon pump (IABP) is one of the most commonly used mechanical circulatory assist devices for high-risk patients undergoing cardiac surgery. In an effort to validate previously reported clinical outcomes, we describe the preoperative characteristics and outcomes of patients who underwent prophylactic IABP in high-risk patients undergoing coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG).

DESIGN:

A prospective observational study.

METHODS:

From 2005 to 2017, 471 patients underwent either isolated or combined CABG at our institution. Of those, 393 patients underwent isolated CABG and were included for the analysis. Eighty-five patients (22%) were considered high-risk and underwent prophylactic IABP, with subsequent review of surgical morbidity and mortality rates.

RESULTS:

The 30-day postoperative mortality (prophylactic IABP group vs non prophylactic IABP group 0% vs 1.6%, p = 0.589) and major adverse cardiac or cerebrovascular events (5.9% vs 3.3%, p = 0.333) were not significantly different between the two groups. Prolonged mechanical ventilation (>72 hours) (12.5% vs 4.2%, p = 0.014) occurred more frequently in the prophylactic IABP group.

CONCLUSIONS:

No IABP-related complications were noted, emphasizing that the use of prophylactic IABP in high-risk patients undergoing CABG is an acceptable option.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Balão Intra-Aórtico Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ponte de Artéria Coronária / Balão Intra-Aórtico Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article