Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The hidden information in patient-reported outcomes and clinician-assessed outcomes: multiple sclerosis as a proof of concept of a machine learning approach.
Brichetto, Giampaolo; Monti Bragadin, Margherita; Fiorini, Samuele; Battaglia, Mario Alberto; Konrad, Giovanna; Ponzio, Michela; Pedullà, Ludovico; Verri, Alessandro; Barla, Annalisa; Tacchino, Andrea.
Afiliação
  • Brichetto G; Department of Research, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Genoa, Italy. giampaolo.brichetto@aism.it.
  • Monti Bragadin M; AISM Rehabilitation Center of Liguria, Genoa, Italy. giampaolo.brichetto@aism.it.
  • Fiorini S; Department of Research, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Genoa, Italy.
  • Battaglia MA; AISM Rehabilitation Center of Liguria, Genoa, Italy.
  • Konrad G; Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
  • Ponzio M; Department of Life Science, University of Siena, Siena, Italy.
  • Pedullà L; AISM Rehabilitation Center of Liguria, Genoa, Italy.
  • Verri A; Department of Research, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Genoa, Italy.
  • Barla A; Department of Research, Italian Multiple Sclerosis Foundation, Genoa, Italy.
  • Tacchino A; Department of Informatics, Bioengineering, Robotics and System Engineering, University of Genoa, Genoa, Italy.
Neurol Sci ; 41(2): 459-462, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31659583
ABSTRACT
Machine learning (ML) applied to patient-reported (PROs) and clinical-assessed outcomes (CAOs) could favour a more predictive and personalized medicine. Our aim was to confirm the important role of applying ML to PROs and CAOs of people with relapsing-remitting (RR) and secondary progressive (SP) form of multiple sclerosis (MS), to promptly identifying information useful to predict disease progression. For our analysis, a dataset of 3398 evaluations from 810 persons with MS (PwMS) was adopted. Three steps were provided course classification; extraction of the most relevant predictors at the next time point; prediction if the patient will experience the transition from RR to SP at the next time point. The Current Course Assignment (CCA) step correctly assigned the current MS course with an accuracy of about 86.0%. The MS course at the next time point can be predicted using the predictors selected in CCA. PROs/CAOs Evolution Prediction (PEP) followed by Future Course Assignment (FCA) was able to foresee the course at the next time point with an accuracy of 82.6%. Our results suggest that PROs and CAOs could help the clinician decision-making in their practice.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Progressão da Doença / Aprendizado de Máquina / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Índice de Gravidade de Doença / Avaliação de Resultados em Cuidados de Saúde / Progressão da Doença / Aprendizado de Máquina / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article