Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Predicting disability progression in multiple sclerosis: Insights from advanced statistical modeling.
Pellegrini, Fabio; Copetti, Massimiliano; Sormani, Maria Pia; Bovis, Francesca; de Moor, Carl; Debray, Thomas Pa; Kieseier, Bernd C.
Afiliação
  • Pellegrini F; Biogen International GmbH, Zug, Switzerland.
  • Copetti M; Unit of Biostatistics, IRCCS Casa Sollievo della Sofferenza Hospital, San Giovanni Rotondo, Italy.
  • Sormani MP; Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy/IRCCS Ospedale Policlinico San Martino, Genova, Italy.
  • Bovis F; Department of Health Sciences (DISSAL), University of Genova, Genova, Italy.
  • de Moor C; Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA.
  • Debray TP; Julius Center for Health Sciences and Primary Care, University Medical Center Utrecht, Utrecht University, Utrecht, The Netherlands.
  • Kieseier BC; Biogen, Cambridge, MA, USA/Department of Neurology, Medical Faculty, Heinrich-Heine University, Düsseldorf, Germany.
Mult Scler ; 26(14): 1828-1836, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31686590
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

There is an unmet need for precise methods estimating disease prognosis in multiple sclerosis (MS).

OBJECTIVE:

Using advanced statistical modeling, we assessed the prognostic value of various clinical measures for disability progression.

METHODS:

Advanced models to assess baseline prognostic factors for disability progression over 2 years were applied to a pooled sample of patients from placebo arms in four different phase III clinical trials. least absolute shrinkage and selection operator (LASSO) and ridge regression, elastic nets, support vector machines, and unconditional and conditional random forests were applied to model time to clinical disability progression confirmed at 24 weeks. Sensitivity analyses for different definitions of a combined endpoint were carried out, and bootstrap was used to assess prediction model performance.

RESULTS:

A total of 1582 patients were included, of which 434 (27.4%) had disability progression in a combined endpoint over 2 years. Overall model discrimination performance was relatively poor (all C-indices ⩽ 0.65) across all models and across different definitions of progression.

CONCLUSION:

Inconsistency of prognostic factor importance ranking confirmed the relatively poor prediction ability of baseline factors in modeling disease progression in MS. Our findings underline the importance to explore alternative predictors as well as alternative definitions of commonly used endpoints.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoas com Deficiência / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pessoas com Deficiência / Esclerose Múltipla Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article