Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
New Antiandrogen Compounds Compared to Docetaxel for Metastatic Hormone Sensitive Prostate Cancer: Results from a Network Meta-Analysis.
Marchioni, Michele; Di Nicola, Marta; Primiceri, Giulia; Novara, Giacomo; Castellan, Pietro; Paul, Asit K; Veccia, Alessandro; Autorino, Riccardo; Cindolo, Luca; Schips, Luigi.
Afiliação
  • Marchioni M; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Di Nicola M; Laboratory of Biostatistics, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Primiceri G; Urology Unit, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
  • Novara G; Department of Urology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Abruzzo, Chieti, Italy.
  • Castellan P; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Paul AK; Laboratory of Biostatistics, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Veccia A; Department of Medical, Oral and Biotechnological Sciences, G. d'Annunzio University of Chieti, Chieti, Italy.
  • Autorino R; Urology Unit, SS. Annunziata Hospital, Chieti, Italy.
  • Cindolo L; Department of Urology, Azienda Sanitaria Locale Abruzzo, Chieti, Italy.
  • Schips L; Department of Surgery, Oncology, and Gastroenterology-Urology Clinic, University of Padua, Padua, Italy.
J Urol ; 203(4): 751-759, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31689158
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

Docetaxel represent the standard of care in patients with metastatic, hormone sensitive prostate cancer. However, androgen receptor axis targeted therapies have also been shown to be effective. We aimed to analyze findings in randomized controlled trials investigating first-line treatment for hormone sensitive prostate cancer. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

We systematically reviewed the literature according to the PRISMA (Preferred Reporting Items for Systematic Reviews and Meta-Analyses) criteria and the PICO (Population, Intervention, Comparator, Outcomes) methodology. Outcomes of interest were overall and progression-free survival, and the rate of high grade adverse events.

RESULTS:

No treatment was superior to docetaxel in terms of overall survival. However, abiraterone (HR 0.89, 95% CI 0.76-1.05), enzalutamide (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.69-1.19) and apalutamide (HR 0.90, 95% CI 0.67-1.22) showed nonstatistically significant lower overall mortality rates than docetaxel. Abiraterone (HR 0.71, 95% CI 0.59-0.86), enzalutamide (HR 0.61, 95% CI 0.49-0.75) and apalutamide (HR 0.74, 95% CI 0.57-0.95) also showed statistically significant lower disease progression rates than docetaxel. Furthermore, abiraterone (OR 0.83, 95% CI 0.56-1.21) showed no statistically significant lower rate of high grade adverse events compared to docetaxel. Finally, enzalutamide (OR 0.56, 95% CI 0.35-0.92) and apalutamide (OR 0.44, 95% CI 0.24-0.79) showed statistically significant lower rates of high grade adverse events compared to docetaxel.

CONCLUSIONS:

Treatment with androgen receptor axis targeted therapies combined with androgen deprivation therapy in patients with hormone sensitive prostate cancer did not offer a statistically significant advantage in overall survival compared to the standard, docetaxel. However, it was associated with a lower disease progression rate. Moreover, apalutamide and enzalutamide offer a better safety profile.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Docetaxel / Antagonistas de Androgênios / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias da Próstata / Docetaxel / Antagonistas de Androgênios / Antineoplásicos Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article