Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-Effectiveness of Dementia Care Mapping in Care-Home Settings: Evaluation of a Randomised Controlled Trial.
Meads, David M; Martin, Adam; Griffiths, Alys; Kelley, Rachael; Creese, Byron; Robinson, Louise; McDermid, Joanne; Walwyn, Rebecca; Ballard, Clive; Surr, Claire A.
Afiliação
  • Meads DM; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK. d.meads@leeds.ac.uk.
  • Martin A; Academic Unit of Health Economics, Leeds Institute of Health Sciences, Worsley Building, Clarendon Way, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Griffiths A; Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
  • Kelley R; Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
  • Creese B; College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Robinson L; Institute for Ageing, Newcastle University, Newcastle, UK.
  • McDermid J; Wolfson Centre for Age Related Diseases, King's College London, London, UK.
  • Walwyn R; Clinical Trials Research Unit, University of Leeds, Leeds, UK.
  • Ballard C; College of Medicine and Health, University of Exeter, Exeter, UK.
  • Surr CA; Centre for Dementia Research, School of Health and Community Studies, Leeds Beckett University, Leeds, UK.
Appl Health Econ Health Policy ; 18(2): 237-247, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31701483
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Behaviours such as agitation impact on the quality of life of care-home residents with dementia and increase healthcare use. Interventions to prevent these behaviours have little evidence supporting their effectiveness or cost-effectiveness. We conducted an economic evaluation alongside a trial assessing Dementia Care Mapping™ (DCM) versus usual care for reducing agitation, and highlight methodological challenges of conducting evaluations in this population and setting.

METHODS:

RCT data over 16 months from English care-home residents with dementia (intervention n = 418; control n = 308) were analysed. We conducted a cost-utility analysis from the healthcare provider perspective. We gathered resource use and utility (EQ-5D-5L and DEMQoL-Proxy-U) from people living with dementia and proxy informants (staff and relatives). Data were analysed using seemingly unrelated regression, accounting for care-home clustering and bootstrapping used to capture sampling uncertainty.

RESULTS:

Costs were higher in the intervention arm than in the control arm (incremental = £1479) due in part to high cost outliers. There were small QALY gains (incremental = 0.024) in favour of DCM. The base-case ICER (£64,380 per QALY) suggests DCM is not cost-effective versus usual care. With the exception of analyses excluding high cost outliers, which suggested a potential for DCM to be cost-effective, sensitivity analyses corroborated the base-case findings. Bootstrapped estimates suggested DCM had a low probability (< 0.20 where λ = £20,000) of being cost-effective versus control.

CONCLUSION:

DCM does not appear to be a cost-effective intervention versus usual care in this group and setting. The evaluation highlighted several methodological challenges relating to validity of utility assessments, loss to follow-up and compliance. Further research is needed on handling high-cost individuals and capturing utility in this group. ISRCTN reference 82288852.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Demência / Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Demência / Serviços de Assistência Domiciliar Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article