Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Mediators of focused psychosocial support interventions for children in low-resource humanitarian settings: analysis from an Individual Participant Dataset with 3,143 participants.
Purgato, Marianna; Tedeschi, Federico; Betancourt, Theresa S; Bolton, Paul; Bonetto, Chiara; Gastaldon, Chiara; Gordon, James; O'Callaghan, Paul; Papola, Davide; Peltonen, Kirsi; Punamaki, Raija-Leena; Richards, Justin; Staples, Julie K; Unterhitzenberger, Johanna; de Jong, Joop; Jordans, Mark J D; Gross, Alden L; Tol, Wietse A; Barbui, Corrado.
Afiliação
  • Purgato M; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Tedeschi F; Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Betancourt TS; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Bolton P; Research Program on Children and Adversity, Boston College School of Social Work, Chestnut Hill, MA, USA.
  • Bonetto C; Center for Humanitarian Health, Department of International Health and Department of Mental Health, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Gastaldon C; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Gordon J; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • O'Callaghan P; Cochrane Global Mental Health, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Papola D; The Center for Mind-Body Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Peltonen K; School of Psychology, Queen's University Belfast, Belfast, UK.
  • Punamaki RL; WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Training in Mental Health and Service Evaluation, Section of Psychiatry, University of Verona, Verona, Italy.
  • Richards J; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Staples JK; Department of Psychology, Faculty of Social Sciences, Tampere University, Tampere, Finland.
  • Unterhitzenberger J; School of Public Health & Charles Perkins Centre, University of Sydney, Sydney, NSW, Australia.
  • de Jong J; Faculty of Health, Victoria University of Wellington, Wellington, New Zealand.
  • Jordans MJD; The Center for Mind-Body Medicine, Washington, D.C, USA.
  • Gross AL; Department of Psychology, Catholic University Eichstaett-Ingolstadt, Eichstaett, Bavaria, Germany.
  • Tol WA; Amsterdam Institute for Social Science Research, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Barbui C; Center for Global Mental Health, Institute of Psychiatry, Psychology & Neuroscience, King's College London, London, UK.
J Child Psychol Psychiatry ; 61(5): 584-593, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31701533
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Research on psychosocial interventions has been focused on the effectiveness of psychosocial interventions on mental health outcomes, without exploring how interventions achieve beneficial effects. Identifying the potential pathways through which interventions work would potentially allow further strengthening of interventions by emphasizing specific components connected with such pathways.

METHODS:

We conducted a preplanned mediation analysis using individual participant data from a dataset of 11 randomized controlled trials (RCTs) which compared focused psychosocial support interventions versus control conditions for children living in low- and middle-income countries (LMICs) affected by humanitarian crises. Based on an ecological resilience framework, we hypothesized that (a) coping, (b) hope, (c) social support, and (d) functional impairment mediate the relationship between intervention and outcome PTSD symptoms. A systematic search on the Cochrane Central Register of Controlled Trials (CENTRAL), MEDLINE, PubMed, PyscARTICLES, Web of Science, and the main local LMICs databases was conducted up to August 2018. The hypotheses were tested by using individual participant data obtained from study authors of all the studies included in the systematic review.

RESULTS:

We included 3,143 children from 11 studies (100% of data from included studies), of which 1,877 from six studies contributed to the mediation analysis. Functional impairment was the strongest mediator for focused psychosocial interventions on PTSD (mediation coefficient -0.087, standard error 0.040). The estimated proportion of effect mediated by functional impairment, and adjusted for confounders, was 31%.

CONCLUSIONS:

Findings did not support the proposed mediation hypotheses for coping, hope, and social support. The mediation through functional impairment may represent unmeasured proxy measures or point to a broader mechanism that impacts self-efficacy and agency.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto / Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial / Intervenção Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Conjuntos de Dados como Assunto / Sistemas de Apoio Psicossocial / Intervenção Psicossocial Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Prognostic_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Child / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article