Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Photobiomodulation effects on head and neck squamous cell carcinoma (HNSCC) in an orthotopic animal model.
Barasch, Andrei; Li, Hongyan; Rajasekhar, Vinagolu K; Raber-Durlacher, Judith; Epstein, Joel B; Carroll, James; Haimovitz-Friedman, Adriana.
Afiliação
  • Barasch A; Department of Medicine, Weil Cornell Medical College, 1300 York Ave, New York, NY, 10065, USA. barasaff@cs.com.
  • Li H; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Rajasekhar VK; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
  • Raber-Durlacher J; Academic Centre for Dentistry Amsterdam, University of Amsterdam and VU University, and University Medical Centers, location AMC, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
  • Epstein JB; Cedars-Sinai Health System, Los Angeles and City of Hope Cancer Center, Duarte, CA, USA.
  • Carroll J; Thor Photomedicine Ltd, Chesham, UK.
  • Haimovitz-Friedman A; Memorial Sloan Kettering Cancer Center, New York, NY, USA.
Support Care Cancer ; 28(6): 2721-2727, 2020 Jun.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31705378
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Photobiomodulation (PBM) has shown efficacy in preventing and treating cancer therapy-induced mucositis and dermatitis. However, there is contradictory information regarding the effect of PBM on (pre)malignant cells, which has led to questions regarding the safety of this technique. We address this issue using an orthotopic mouse model (Cal-33) with human squamous cell carcinoma of the oral cavity.

METHODS:

Mice with actively growing orthotopic Cal-33 head and neck carcinoma tumors were divided into 4 groups control, PBM only, radiation therapy (RT) only, and PBM + RT. We performed three experiments (1) PBM at 660 nm, 18.4 J/cm2, and 5 RT × 4 Gy doses delivered daily; (2) PBM at 660 nm, 18.4 J/cm2, and 1 × 15 Gy RT; and (3) PBM at 660 nm + 850 nm, 45 mW/cm2, 3.4 J/cm2, and 1 × 15 Gy RT. Mice were weighed daily and tumor volumes were evaluated by IVIS. Survival time was also evaluated.

RESULTS:

Animals treated with RT survived significantly longer and had significantly smaller tumor volume when compared with the control and PBM-only treatment groups. No significant differences were noted between the RT alone and PBM + RT groups in any of the experiments.

CONCLUSION:

Our results suggest that PBM at the utilized parameters does not provide protection to the tumor from the killing effects of RT.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade / Mucosite / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radioterapia / Terapia com Luz de Baixa Intensidade / Mucosite / Carcinoma de Células Escamosas de Cabeça e Pescoço Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article