Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Agua4All: Providing Safe Drinking Water in Rural California Communities.
Patel, Anisha I; Hecht, Amelie A; Hampton, Karla E; Hecht, Christina; Buck, Sarah.
Afiliação
  • Patel AI; Division of General Pediatrics, Stanford University, Medical School Office Building, 1265 Welch Road, Stanford, CA 94305. Email: anipatel@stanford.edu.
  • Hecht AA; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Hampton KE; Philip R. Lee Institute for Health Policy Studies, University of California, San Francisco, California.
  • Hecht C; Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, Maryland.
  • Buck S; Intuitive Mind Consulting, Houston, Texas.
Prev Chronic Dis ; 16: E151, 2019 11 14.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31726021
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Drinking water instead of sugar-sweetened beverages may reduce obesity and dental caries. Tap water is more affordable and sustainable than bottled water and more likely to contain fluoride, which prevents caries. To address inequities in access to safe tap water, cross-sector partners established the Agua4All safe drinking-water program in 2 rural San Joaquin Valley, California, communities. The program's objective was to examine Agua4All's feasibility, acceptability, and effect on water intake.

METHODS:

We provided bottle-filling stations dispensing safe water at 12 sites in 2 communities and provided limited promotional support. To compare the effect of different levels of promotion, sites in 1 community also received a promotions toolkit, a stipend, and assistance in developing and conducting their own promotional activities (site-led promotion). Beverage intake at sites was observed at baseline (pre-installation), at time 1 (post-installation), and at times 2 and 3 (post-promotion). Flowmeters tracked water dispensings. Staff interviews examined implementation barriers and facilitators.

RESULTS:

From baseline to time 3, a nonsignificant increase (21.16%) occurred in the proportion of people drinking water at sites with water stations and site-led promotion compared with sites with water stations and limited promotion (5.13%) (P = .14). Mean daily gallons of water taken from stations per site was 3.61 (standard deviation, 3.84). Most staff members (77%) at the sites preferred water stations to traditional drinking fountains.

CONCLUSION:

Bottle-filling stations with safe water and site-led promotion are a promising strategy for increasing water intake in communities without safe tap water. Larger studies should examine the effects of such stations on intake of sugar-sweetened beverages and on overall health.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Abastecimento de Água / Água Potável Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: População Rural / Abastecimento de Água / Água Potável Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article