Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ticagrelor monotherapy versus aspirin in patients undergoing multiple arterial or single arterial coronary artery bypass grafting: insights from the TiCAB trial.
Sandner, Sigrid E; Schunkert, Heribert; Kastrati, Adnan; Wiedemann, Dominik; Misfeld, Martin; Böning, Andreas; Tebbe, Ulrich; Nowak, Bernd; Stritzke, Jan; Laufer, Günther; von Scheidt, Moritz.
Afiliação
  • Sandner SE; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Schunkert H; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Kastrati A; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Wiedemann D; Klinik für Herz- und Kreislauferkrankungen, Deutsches Herzzentrum München, Technische Universität München, Munich, Germany.
  • Misfeld M; German Center for Cardiovascular Research (DZHK), Munich Heart Alliance, Munich, Germany.
  • Böning A; Division of Cardiac Surgery, Department of Surgery, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
  • Tebbe U; Department of Cardiac Surgery, Leipzig Heart Center, Leipzig, Germany.
  • Nowak B; Department of Cardiovascular Surgery, University Hospital Giessen, Giessen, Germany.
  • Stritzke J; Department of Cardiology, Angiology and Intensive Care Medicine, Hospital Lippe-Detmold, Detmold, Germany.
  • Laufer G; Cardiovascular Center Bethanien, Frankfurt, Germany.
  • von Scheidt M; Marienstein Privatklinik, List, Germany.
Eur J Cardiothorac Surg ; 57(4): 732-739, 2020 04 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31750899
OBJECTIVES: We evaluated the effect of ticagrelor monotherapy on outcomes after multiple arterial grafting (MAG) or single arterial grafting (SAG) in coronary artery bypass grafting (CABG). METHODS: In a post hoc, non-randomized analysis of the TiCAB (Ticagrelor in CABG; ClinicalTrials.gov NCT01755520) trial, we compared event rates for ticagrelor versus aspirin in patients undergoing MAG and SAG. Primary outcome was the composite of cardiovascular death, non-fatal myocardial infarction (MI), stroke or repeat revascularization 1 year after CABG. Secondary outcomes included individual components of the primary end point, all-cause death and bleeding. RESULTS: Among 1753 patients, 998 patients underwent MAG and 755 patients underwent SAG. There was no significant difference in the 1-year primary composite outcome for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG [7.2% vs 7.9%; hazard ratio (HR) 0.90, 95% confidence interval (CI) 0.57-1.43; P = 0.66] or SAG (12.3% vs 8.6%; HR 1.47, 95% CI 0.93-2.31; P = 0.10). Event rates for cardiovascular death, MI, stroke, repeat revascularization and all-cause death were similar for both treatment groups with MAG and SAG. No significant difference in major bleeding was observed for ticagrelor versus aspirin with MAG (2.6% vs 2.7%; HR 0.95, 95% CI 0.44-2.05; P = 0.90) or SAG (5.8% vs 4.0%; HR 1.49, 95% CI 0.77-2.89; P = 0.24). CONCLUSIONS: In patients undergoing either MAG or SAG in the TiCAB trial, ticagrelor monotherapy compared with aspirin did not affect the rate of cardiovascular death, non-fatal MI, stroke or repeat revascularization, or the rate of bleeding, at 1 year after CABG.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doença da Artéria Coronariana / Acidente Vascular Cerebral / Infarto do Miocárdio Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article