Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Prone Position in Acute Respiratory Distress Syndrome Patients: A Retrospective Analysis of Complications.
Lucchini, Alberto; Bambi, Stefano; Mattiussi, Elisa; Elli, Stefano; Villa, Laura; Bondi, Herman; Rona, Roberto; Fumagalli, Roberto; Foti, Giuseppe.
Afiliação
  • Lucchini A; Alberto Lucchini, RN, is head nurse at the General Intensive Care Unit, ASST Monza, San Gerardo Hospital, Italy. He is the coordinator of the master's degree program in intensive and critical care nursing at Milano-Bicocca University, Italy. Stefano Bambi, PhD, MSc, RN, CCN, is a staff nurse at the Medical & Surgical Intensive Care Unit, Careggi Teaching Hospital, Florence, Italy. He was formerly a lecturer in emergency and critical care nursing at University of Florence (Italy). Elisa Matti
Dimens Crit Care Nurs ; 39(1): 39-46, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31789984
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Early application of prolonged prone positioning has been shown to improve patient survival in moderate to severe adult respiratory distress syndrome (ARDS) patients. Prone position is a key component of lung protective mechanical ventilation in association with low tidal volume and neuromuscular blocking agents in patients with severe ARDS. Pressure sores are the major prone position complication. The rate of complication is lowering with the increase in center expertise.

AIMS:

The aim of this study was to examine the onset of pressure sores and other complications caused by the use of prone position in patients having ARDS.

DESIGN:

This is a single-center, retrospective, observational study.

RESULTS:

One hundred seventy patients were enrolled, with a median age of 49 years (interquartile range [IQR], 38-63). Of all participants, 58% (n = 98) survived the intensive care unit recovery. The total prone position maneuvers were 526, with a median of 2 prone position sessions for each patient (IQR, 1-3). The median length of the prone position session was 9 hours (IQR, 7-12). Twenty-three patients developed pressure sores after prone position (14%). The anatomical positions of pressure sores were as follows face/chin, 5% (n = 8); face/cheekbones, 6% (n = 11); thorax, 2% (n = 3); trochanter, 1% (n = 1); and other sites, 5% (n = 8). Complications were observed in 1% (n = 6) of all pronation maneuvers (vomit, 2%; respiratory device removal, 0.4%). No removal of intravascular catheter was observed.

CONCLUSIONS:

The onset rate of complications given by the use of prone position in ARDS patients is similar to data reported by previous literature. The implementation of a dedicated protocol in specialized centers and the involvement of 5 trained and skilled professionals while moving the patient in the prone position are recommended to prevent the occurrence of similar adverse events.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Decúbito Ventral / Úlcera por Pressão / Posicionamento do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Síndrome do Desconforto Respiratório / Decúbito Ventral / Úlcera por Pressão / Posicionamento do Paciente Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article