Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Understanding price incentives to upsize combination meals at large US fast-food restaurants.
Vercammen, Kelsey A; Frelier, Johannah M; Moran, Alyssa J; Dunn, Caroline G; Musicus, Aviva A; Wolfson, Julia; Ullah, Omar S; Bleich, Sara N.
Afiliação
  • Vercammen KA; Department of Epidemiology, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, 677 Huntington Avenue, Boston, MA 02115, USA.
  • Frelier JM; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Moran AJ; Department of Health Policy and Management, Johns Hopkins Bloomberg School of Public Health, Baltimore, MD, USA.
  • Dunn CG; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Musicus AA; Department of Nutrition, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
  • Wolfson J; Department of Health Management and Policy, University of Michigan School of Public Health, Ann Arbor, MI, USA.
  • Ullah OS; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health, California State University, Northridge, Los Angeles, CA, USA.
  • Bleich SN; Department of Health Policy and Management, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
Public Health Nutr ; 23(2): 348-355, 2020 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31796142
OBJECTIVE: To understand price incentives to upsize combination meals at fast-food restaurants by comparing the calories (i.e. kilocalories; 1 kcal = 4·184 kJ) per dollar of default combination meals (as advertised on the menu) with a higher-calorie version (created using realistic consumer additions and portion-size changes). DESIGN: Combination meals (lunch/dinner: n 258, breakfast: n 68, children's: n 34) and their prices were identified from online menus; corresponding nutrition information for each menu item was obtained from a restaurant nutrition database (MenuStat). Linear models were used to examine the difference in total calories per dollar between default and higher-calorie combination meals, overall and by restaurant. SETTING: Ten large fast-food chain restaurants located in the fifteen most populous US cities in 2017-2018. PARTICIPANTS: None. RESULTS: There were significantly more calories per dollar in higher-calorie v. default combination meals for lunch/dinner (default: 577 kJ (138 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 707 kJ (169 kcal)/dollar, difference: 130 kJ (31 kcal)/dollar, P < 0·001) and breakfast (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 607 kJ (145 kcal)/dollar, difference: 71 kJ (17 kcal)/dollar, P = 0·009). Results for children's meals were in the same direction but were not statistically significant (default: 536 kJ (128 kcal)/dollar, higher-calorie: 741 kJ (177 kcal)/dollar, difference: 205 kJ (49 kcal)/dollar, P = 0·053). Across restaurants, the percentage change in calories per dollar for higher-calorie v. default combination meals ranged from 0·1 % (Dunkin' Donuts) to 55·0 % (Subway). CONCLUSIONS: Higher-calorie combination meals in fast-food restaurants offer significantly more calories per dollar compared with default combination meals, suggesting there is a strong financial incentive for consumers to 'upsize' their orders. Future research should test price incentives for lower-calorie options to promote healthier restaurant choices.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Restaurantes / Ingestão de Energia / Fast Foods / Refeições / Tamanho da Porção Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Restaurantes / Ingestão de Energia / Fast Foods / Refeições / Tamanho da Porção Tipo de estudo: Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Humans País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article