Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Dynamic rodent behavioral response to predation risk: implications for disease ecology.
Moll, Remington J; Eaton, Jeremiah T; Cepek, Jonathon D; Lorch, Patrick D; Dennis, Patricia M; Robison, Terry; Tsao, Jean; Montgomery, Robert A.
Afiliação
  • Moll RJ; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Road, Room 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA. rjmoll@msu.edu.
  • Eaton JT; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Road, Room 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
  • Cepek JD; Natural Resources, Cleveland Metroparks, 9485 Eastland Road, Strongsville, OH, 44149, USA.
  • Lorch PD; Natural Resources, Cleveland Metroparks, 2277 West Ridgewood Drive, Parma, OH, 44134, USA.
  • Dennis PM; Conservation and Science, Cleveland Metroparks Zoo, 3900 Wildlife Way, Cleveland, OH, 44109, USA.
  • Robison T; Department of Veterinary Preventive Medicine, The Ohio State University, 1920 Coffey Rd, Columbus, OH, 43210, USA.
  • Tsao J; Natural Resources, Cleveland Metroparks, 2277 West Ridgewood Drive, Parma, OH, 44134, USA.
  • Montgomery RA; Department of Fisheries and Wildlife, Michigan State University, 480 Wilson Road, Room 13 Natural Resources Building, East Lansing, MI, 48824, USA.
Oecologia ; 192(1): 67-78, 2020 Jan.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31813024
ABSTRACT
Prey modify their behavior in response to variation in predation risk, and such modifications can affect trophic processes such as disease transmission. However, variation in predation risk is complex, arising from direct risk from the predator itself and indirect risk due to the environment. Moreover, direct risk typically stems from multiple predators and varies over timescales (e.g., a predator nearby vs. its seasonal activities). We implemented a field-based experiment to disentangle these sources of risk and relate them to antipredator behavior in rodents. We modeled rodent occurrence and activity as a function of short- and long-term risk from a primary predator, red foxes (Vulpes vulpes), long-term risk from a second predator, coyotes (Canis latrans), and environmental variables. We found that long-term red fox activity strongly reduced rodent occurrence and that cues of nearby red fox presence decreased rodent activity by > 50%. In addition, this activity reduction was dynamic in that varied according to the background level of long-term red fox activity. Importantly, rodents did not respond to environmental variables (moonlight, temperature, and habitat) or long-term coyote activity. These results bear upon recent work that suggests predators can alter tick-borne disease dynamics via induced antipredator behavior of rodents, which are hosts for pathogens and ticks. Specifically, our study corroborates the hypothesis that red foxes act as important proximal agents in regulating tick-borne diseases by reducing rodent activity. More generally, this study highlights the need to consider the dynamic nature of prey antipredator response across landscapes with variable long-term predation risk.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Predatório / Roedores Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamento Predatório / Roedores Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Animals Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article