Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Validation of an automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement.
Pang, Yi; Sparschu, Lauren; Nylin, Elyse.
Afiliação
  • Pang Y; Department of Dean's Education, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Sparschu L; Department of Dean's Education, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
  • Nylin E; Department of Dean's Education, Illinois College of Optometry, Chicago, Illinois, USA.
Clin Exp Optom ; 103(5): 663-667, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31822041
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The aim of this study was to determine the repeatability of an automated-ETDRS (Early Treatment Diabetic Retinopathy Study) near and intermediate visual acuity measurement in subjects with normal visual acuity and subjects with reduced visual acuity. The agreement of automated-ETDRS with gold standard chart-based visual acuity measurement was also studied.

METHODS:

Fifty-one subjects were tested (aged 23 to 91 years; 33 subjects with normal visual acuity 6/7.5 or better; 18 subjects with reduced visual acuity 6/9 to 6/30). Near and intermediate visual acuity of one eye from each subject was measured with an automated tablet-computer system (M&S Technologies, Inc.) and Precision Vision paper chart in a random sequence. Subjects were retested one week later. Repeatability was evaluated using the 95 per cent limits of agreement (LoA) between the two visits.

RESULTS:

Average difference between automated-ETDRS near visual acuity and near visual acuity by paper chart was 0.02 ± 0.10 logMAR (p > 0.05). Agreement of near visual acuity between automated-ETDRS and paper chart was good, with 95 per cent LoA of ±0.19 logMAR. Furthermore, automated-ETDRS near visual acuity showed good repeatability (95 per cent LoA of ±0.20). Mean difference between automated-ETDRS intermediate visual acuity and intermediate visual acuity by paper chart was 0.02 ± 0.10 logMAR (p > 0.05). Agreement of intermediate visual acuity between automated-ETDRS and paper chart was good, with 95 per cent LoA of ±0.20 logMAR. In addition, automated-ETDRS intermediate visual acuity had good repeatability (95 per cent LoA of ±0.16).

CONCLUSION:

Automated-ETDRS near and intermediate visual acuity measurement showed good repeatability and agreement with the gold standard chart-based visual acuity measurement. The findings of this study indicate the automated visual acuity measurement system may have potential for use in both patient care and clinical trials.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Visuais / Algoritmos / Acuidade Visual / Diagnóstico por Computador / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Testes Visuais / Algoritmos / Acuidade Visual / Diagnóstico por Computador / Retinopatia Diabética Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article