Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Harm Perceptions of Alternative Tobacco Products among US Adolescents.
Kong, Grace; Simon, Patricia; Mayer, Margaret E; Barrington-Trimis, Jessica L; Pacek, Lauren R; Cooper, Maria; Guy, Mignonne C; Stanton, Cassandra A.
Afiliação
  • Kong G; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT.
  • Simon P; Yale School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry, New Haven, CT.
  • Mayer ME; Yale School of Public Health, Department of Chronic Disease Epidemiology, New Haven, CT.
  • Barrington-Trimis JL; University of Southern California, Department of Preventive Medicine, Los Angeles, CA.
  • Pacek LR; Duke University School of Medicine, Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Durham, NC.
  • Cooper M; Adjunct Faculty, The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston (UTHealth), School of Public Health Austin Campus, Houston, TX.
  • Guy MC; Virginia Commonwealth University College of Humanities and Sciences, Department of African American Studies, Richmond, VA.
  • Stanton CA; Westat, Center for Evaluation and Coordination of Training and Research (CECTR) in Tobacco Regulatory Science, Washington, DC.
Tob Regul Sci ; 5(3): 242-252, 2019 May.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31840041
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

In this study, we identified groups of adolescents who share similar awareness and perceptions of harm regarding e-cigarettes, cigars, hookah, and smokeless tobacco.

METHODS:

We used latent class analyses (LCA) with the data from Wave 1 (2013-14) of the Population Assessment of Tobacco and Health youth and parent survey (PATH; N = 13,650) to address the research goal. Multinomial logistic regression analysis assessed the associations between identified classes with demographic characteristics and tobacco use.

RESULTS:

LCA identified 5 classes (1) perceived harm across all alternative tobacco products (36.6%); (2) perceived harm for e-cigarettes and smokeless tobacco but never heard of cigars and hookah (48.2%); (3) never heard of alternative tobacco products (8.6%); (4) mix of no harm and harm across alternative tobacco products (5.2%); and (5) "don't know" the harm across alternative tobacco products (1.4%). Relative to the class who perceived harm across all alternative tobacco products, classes of adolescents who were unaware of the products or did not know the harms were more likely to be non-white, younger, have lower parental education, and less likely to have tried an alternative tobacco product.

CONCLUSIONS:

Tobacco prevention should target vulnerable youth, such as adolescents who are non-white, young, and have low parental education.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article