Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Ultrasound-guided axillary vein puncture for cardiac devices implantation in patients under antithrombotic therapy.
ElJamili, Mohammed; Bun, Sok-Sithikun; Latcu, Decebal Gabriel; Delassi, Tahar; Elhattaoui, Mustapha; Saoudi, Nadir.
Afiliação
  • ElJamili M; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco; Department of Cardiology, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France. Electronic address: drsimojamil@yahoo.com.
  • Bun SS; Department of Cardiology, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France.
  • Latcu DG; Department of Cardiology, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France.
  • Delassi T; Department of Cardiology, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France.
  • Elhattaoui M; Department of Cardiology, University Hospital Mohammed VI, Marrakech, Morocco.
  • Saoudi N; Department of Cardiology, Princess Grace Hospital, Monaco, France.
Indian Pacing Electrophysiol J ; 20(1): 21-26, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31857214
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ultrasound-guided axillary venous puncture (UGAVP) for cardiac devices implantation has been developed because of its rapidity, safety and potential long-term lead protection. Early work excluded defibrillators (ICD), cardiac resynchronization therapy (CRT) and upgrade procedures. Compared to the cephalic approach, in previous studies, there was a greater use of pressure dressings with this technique, suggesting a higher risk of bleeding.

AIMS:

To assess UGAVP in patients under antithrombotic therapy (ATT) undergoing cardiac devices implantation including CRT/ICD.

METHODS:

Prospectively, consecutive patients eligible for a pacemaker or ICD implantation were included. All procedures were performed by a single operator, experienced with UGAVP for femoral access, and fluoroscopy-guided axillary vein access. Guidewires insertion time (from lidocaïne administration), and complications were systematically studied.

RESULTS:

From 457 cardiac device implantations, 200 patients (77.8 ± 10 y, male 58%) 360 leads were implanted by UGAVP including 36 ICD, 54 CRT and 14 upgrade procedures. A majority (90%) was under ATT Vitamin K Antagonist or Heparin (n = 58, 29%), direct oral anticoagulant (n = 46, 23%), dual antithrombotic therapy (n = 18, 9%) and single antiplatelet drug (n = 82, 41%). UGAVP was successful in 95.78%. Mean insertion time for 1.8 guidewires per patient was 4.68 ± 3.6 min. No complication (no hematoma) was observed during the follow-up (mean of 45 ± 10 months). Guidewires insertion time reached its plateau after 15 patients.

CONCLUSION:

UGAVP is fast, feasible and safe for patients under ATT undergoing device implantation including CRT/ICD and upgrade procedures, with a short learning curve.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article