Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluating differences in the clinical impact of a free online weight loss programme, a resource-intensive commercial weight loss programme and an active control condition: a parallel randomised controlled trial.
Innes, Aidan Q; Thomson, Greig; Cotter, Mary; King, James A; Vollaard, Niels B J; Kelly, Benjamin M.
Afiliação
  • Innes AQ; Nuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield Health, Ashley Avenue, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5AL, UK.
  • Thomson G; Faculty of Health, Psychology and Social Care, Manchester Metropolitan University, Manchester, M15 6GX, UK.
  • Cotter M; Nuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield Health, Ashley Avenue, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5AL, UK.
  • King JA; Nuffield Health Research Group, Nuffield Health, Ashley Avenue, Epsom, Surrey, KT18 5AL, UK.
  • Vollaard NBJ; National Centre for Sport and Exercise Medicine, Loughborough University, Loughborough, LE11 3TU, UK.
  • Kelly BM; National Institute for Health Research Leicester Biomedical Research Centre, Leicester, LE3 8QD, UK.
BMC Public Health ; 19(1): 1732, 2019 Dec 23.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31870345
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Finding effective intervention strategies to combat rising obesity levels could significantly reduce the burden that obesity and associated non-communicable diseases places on both individuals and the National Health Service.

METHODS:

In this parallel randomised-controlled trial, 76 participants who are overweight or obese (50 female) were given free access to a fitness centre for the duration of the 12-week intervention and randomised to one of three interventions. The commercial intervention, the Healthy Weight Programme, (HWP, n = 25, 10/15 men/women) consisted of twelve 1-h nutrition coaching sessions with a nutritionist delivered as a mixture of group and 1 to 1 sessions. In addition, twice-weekly exercise sessions (24 in total) were delivered by personal trainers for 12 weeks. The NHS intervention (n = 25, 8/17 men/women) consisted of following an entirely self-managed 12-week online NHS resource. The GYM intervention (n = 26, 8/18 men/women) received no guidance or formal intervention. All participants were provided with a gym induction for safety and both the NHS and GYM participants were familiarised with ACSM physical activity guidelines by way of a hand-out.

RESULTS:

The overall follow-up rate was 83%. Body mass was significantly reduced at post-intervention in all groups (HWP N = 18, - 5.17 ± 4.22 kg, NHS N = 21-4.19 ± 5.49 kg; GYM N = 24-1.17 ± 3.00 kg; p < 0.001) with greater reductions observed in HWP and NHS groups compared to GYM (p < 0.05). Out with body mass and BMI, there were no additional statistically significant time x intervention interaction effects.

CONCLUSIONS:

This is the first study to evaluate the efficacy of both a free online NHS self-help weight-loss tool and a commercial weight loss programme that provides face-to-face nutritional support and supervised exercise. The findings suggest that both interventions are superior to an active control condition with regard to eliciting short-term weight-loss. TRIAL REGISTRATION ISRCTN Registry - ISRCTN31489026. Prospectively registered 27/07/16.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sobrepeso / Programas de Redução de Peso / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Sobrepeso / Programas de Redução de Peso / Obesidade Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Evaluation_studies Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: Europa Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2019 Tipo de documento: Article