Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Plasma vs. serum in circulating tumor DNA measurement: characterization by DNA fragment sizing and digital droplet polymerase chain reaction.
Lee, Jee-Soo; Kim, Miyoung; Seong, Moon-Woo; Kim, Han-Sung; Lee, Young Kyung; Kang, Hee Jung.
Afiliação
  • Lee JS; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim M; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
  • Seong MW; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Seoul National University Hospital, Seoul National University College of Medicine, Seoul, Republic of Korea.
  • Kim HS; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
  • Lee YK; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
  • Kang HJ; Department of Laboratory Medicine, Hallym University Sacred Heart Hospital, Anyang, Republic of Korea.
Clin Chem Lab Med ; 58(4): 527-532, 2020 03 26.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31874093
ABSTRACT
Background Choosing the specimen type is the first step of the pre-analytical process. Previous reports suggested plasma as the optimal specimen for circulating tumor DNA (ctDNA) analysis. However, head-to-head comparisons between plasma and serum using platforms with high analytical sensitivity, such as droplet digital polymerase chain reaction (ddPCR), are limited, and several recent studies have supported the clinical utility of serum-derived ctDNA. This study aimed to compare the DNA profiles isolated from plasma and serum, characterize the effects of the differences between specimens on ctDNA measurement, and determine the major contributors to these differences. Methods We isolated cell-free DNA (cfDNA) from 119 matched plasma/serum samples from cancer patients and analyzed the cfDNA profiles by DNA fragment sizing. We then assessed KRAS mutations in ctDNA from matched plasma/serum using ddPCR. Results The amount of large DNA fragments was increased in serum, whereas that of cfDNA fragments (<800 bp) was similar in both specimens. ctDNA was less frequently detected in serum, and the KRAS-mutated fraction in serum was significantly lower than that in plasma. The differences in ctDNA fractions between the two specimen types correlated well with the amount of large DNA fragments and white blood cell and neutrophil counts. Conclusions Our results provided detailed insights into the differences between plasma and serum using DNA fragment sizing and ddPCR, potentially contributing to ctDNA analysis standardization. Our study also suggested that using plasma minimizes the dilution of tumor-derived DNA and optimizes the sensitivity of ctDNA analysis. So, plasma should be the preferred specimen type.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plasma / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase / Soro / DNA Tumoral Circulante Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Plasma / Reação em Cadeia da Polimerase / Soro / DNA Tumoral Circulante Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article