Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Reproducibility of DXA-based bone strain index and the influence of body mass: an in vivo study.
Messina, Carmelo; Piodi, Luca Petruccio; Rinaudo, Luca; Buonomenna, Ciriaco; Sconfienza, Luca Maria; Vergani, Laura; Ulivieri, Fabio Massimo.
Afiliação
  • Messina C; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
  • Piodi LP; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal, 36, 20100, Milan, Italy.
  • Rinaudo L; Gastroenterologia ed Endoscopia Digestiva, Fondazione IRCCS Ca' Granda Ospedale Maggiore Policlinico, Via Francesco Sforza 35, 20122, Milan, Italy.
  • Buonomenna C; TECHNOLOGIC Srl, Lungo Dora Voghera 34/36, 10153, Turin, Italy.
  • Sconfienza LM; Scuola di Specializzazione in Radiodiagnostica, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Festa del Perdono 7, 20122, Milan, Italy.
  • Vergani L; IRCCS Istituto Ortopedico Galeazzi, Via Riccardo Galeazzi 4, 20161, Milan, Italy.
  • Ulivieri FM; Dipartimento di Scienze Biomediche per la Salute, Università degli Studi di Milano, Via Pascal, 36, 20100, Milan, Italy.
Radiol Med ; 125(3): 313-318, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31883053
OBJECTIVES: Bone strain index (BSI) is a dual-energy X-ray absorptiometry (DXA)-derived index of bone strength obtained from lumbar densitometric scan. We estimated the reproducibility of BSI in healthy women with different body mass index. METHODS: We enrolled postmenopausal women (mean age ± SD: 66 ± 10 years) divided into three groups (A, B and C) according to body mass index (BMI: < 25; 25-29.9; ≥ 30 kg/m2) and two groups (D and E) according to waist circumference (WC: ≤ 88; > 88 cm), each of 30 subjects. They underwent two DXA examinations with in-between repositioning, according to the International Society for Clinical Densitometry guidelines for precision estimation. Bone mineral density (BMD) and BSI were expressed as g/cm2 and absolute value, respectively. The coefficient of variation (CoV) was calculated as the ratio between root-mean-square standard deviation and mean; least significant change percentage (LSC%) as 2.77 × CoV; reproducibility as the complement to 100% LSC. RESULTS: BSI increased proportionally to BMI and WC and significantly in group C compared to B and A (p = 0.032 and 0.006, respectively). BSI was significantly higher in E compared to D (p = 0.017), whereas no differences were observed in BMD. Although BSI reproducibility was slightly lower in group C (89%), the differences were not significant between all groups. BMD reproducibility did not significantly differ between all groups. CONCLUSIONS: BSI reproducibility was significantly lower than that of BMD and decreased proportionally to BMI and WC increase. This reduction of BSI reproducibility was more pronounced in patients with BMI ≥ 30 and WC > 88, as expected, being BSI a parameter sensible to weight.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osso e Ossos / Absorciometria de Fóton / Índice de Massa Corporal / Circunferência da Cintura Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osso e Ossos / Absorciometria de Fóton / Índice de Massa Corporal / Circunferência da Cintura Tipo de estudo: Guideline / Observational_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article