Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness of intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel®) versus percutaneous laser disc decompression in patients with chronic radicular low back pain.
Hashemi, Masoud; Dadkhah, Payman; Taheri, Mehrdad; Katibeh, Pegah; Asadi, Saman.
Afiliação
  • Hashemi M; Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Dadkhah P; Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Taheri M; Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
  • Katibeh P; Department of Pediatric Neurology, Shiraz University of Medical Sciences, Shiraz, Iran.
  • Asadi S; Anesthesiology Research Center, Shahid Beheshti University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.
Korean J Pain ; 33(1): 66-72, 2020 Jan 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31888320
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Low back pain secondary to discopathy is a common pain disorder. Multiple minimally invasive therapeutic modalities have been proposed; however, to date no study has compared percutaneous laser disc decompression (PLDD) with intradiscal injection of radiopaque gelified ethanol (DiscoGel®). We are introducing the first study on patient-reported outcomes of DiscoGel® vs. PLDD for radiculopathy.

METHODS:

Seventy-two patients were randomly selected from either a previous strategy of PLDD or DiscoGel®, which had been performed in our center during 2016-2017. Participants were asked about their numeric rating scale (NRS) scores, Oswestry disability index (ODI) scores, and progression to secondary treatment.

RESULTS:

The mean NRS scores in the total cohort before intervention was 8.0, and was reduced to 4.3 in the DiscoGel® group and 4.2 in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. The mean ODI score before intervention was 81.25% which was reduced to 41.14% in the DiscoGel® group and 52.86% in the PLDD group after 12 months, which was statistically significant. Between-group comparison of NRS scores after two follow-ups were not statistically different (P = 0.62) but the ODI score in DiscoGel® was statistically lower (P = 0.001). Six cases (16.67%) from each group reported undergoing surgery after the follow-up period which was not statistically different.

CONCLUSIONS:

Both techniques were equivalent in pain reduction but DiscoGel® had a greater effect on decreasing disability after 12 months, although the rate of progression to secondary treatments and/or surgery was almost equal in the two groups.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article