Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
What is the inter-rater agreement of injury classification using the WHO minimum data set for emergency medical teams?
Jafar, Anisa Jabeen Nasir; Sergeant, Jamie C; Lecky, Fiona.
Afiliação
  • Jafar AJN; HCRI, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK anisa.jafar@manchester.ac.uk.
  • Sergeant JC; Centre for Biostatistics, School of Health Sciences, Faculty of Biology, Medicine and Health, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
  • Lecky F; Centre for Musculoskeletal Research, Arthritis Research UK Centre for Epidemiology, University of Manchester, Manchester, UK.
Emerg Med J ; 37(2): 58-64, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31911417
BACKGROUND: In 2017, the WHO produced its first minimum data set (MDS) for emergency medical team (EMT) daily reporting during the sudden-onset disasters (SODs), following expert consensus. The MDS was deliberately designed to be simple in order to improve the rate of data capture; however, it is new and untested. This study assesses the inter-rater agreement between practitioners when performing the injury aspect of coding within the WHO EMT MDS. METHODS: 25 clinical case vignettes were developed, reflecting potential injuries encountered in an SOD. These were presented online from April to July 2018 to practitioners who have experience of/training in managing patients in SODs The practitioners were from UK-Med's members, Australian Medical Assistance Team's Northern Territory members and New Zealand Medical Assistance Team members. Practitioners were asked to code injuries according to WHO EMT MDS case classifications. Randolph's kappa statistic for free-marginal multirater data was calculated for the whole dataset as well as subgroups to ascertain inter-rater agreement. RESULTS: 86 practitioners responded (20.6% response rate), giving >2000 individual case responses. Overall agreement was moderate at 67.9% with a kappa of 0.59 (95% CI 0.49 to 0.69). Despite subgroups of paramedics (kappa 0.63, 95% CI 0.53 to 0.72), doctors (kappa 0.61, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.69) and those with disaster experience (kappa 0.62, 95% CI 0.52 to 0.71) suggesting slightly higher agreement, their CIs (and those of other subgroups) suggest overall similar and moderate levels of practitioner agreement in classifying injuries according to the MDS categories. CONCLUSIONS: An inter-rater agreement of 0.59 is moderate, at best, however, it gives ministries of health some sense of how tightly they may interpret injury data derived from daily reports using WHO EMT MDS. Furthermore, this kappa is similar to established but more complex (thus more contextually impractical) injury scores. Similar studies, with weighting for injury likelihood using sample data from SODs would further refine the level of expected inter-rater agreement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos e Lesões / Classificação / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Limite: Humans País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ferimentos e Lesões / Classificação / Serviços Médicos de Emergência Limite: Humans País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article