Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Metered-dose inhaler ipratropium bromide for children with acute asthma exacerbation: A prospective, non-randomized, observational study.
Nomura, Osamu; Ihara, Takateru; Morikawa, Yoshihiko; Sakakibara, Hiroshi; Hagiwara, Yusuke; Inoue, Nobuaki; Akasawa, Akira.
Afiliação
  • Nomura O; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical , Tokyo, Japan.
  • Ihara T; Department of Emergency and Disaster Medicine, Hirosaki University, Hirosaki, Aomori, Japan.
  • Morikawa Y; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical , Tokyo, Japan.
  • Sakakibara H; Clinical Research Support Center, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Tokyo.
  • Hagiwara Y; Departments of General Pediatrics, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical Center, Japan, Tokyo.
  • Inoue N; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical , Tokyo, Japan.
  • Akasawa A; Division of Pediatric Emergency Medicine, Tokyo Metropolitan Children's Medical , Tokyo, Japan.
Pediatr Int ; 62(3): 319-323, 2020 Mar.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31930755
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Ipratropium bromide (IB), when administered with ß2-agonists, is effective in reducing hospital admissions of children presenting to the emergency department (ED) with severe asthma. While IB is commonly delivered in its nebulized form, using a metered-dose inhaler (MDI), can, reportedly, shorten patients' length of stay in the ED. However, the effectiveness and safety of IB administration using an MDI with a spacer have not been established. This study aimed to investigate the effectiveness and safety of MDI-delivered IB in pediatric patients with acute asthma exacerbation.

METHODS:

This prospective, non-randomized, observational study included patients aged ≥4 years with a history of severe asthma exacerbation. Patients received IB via MDI with a spacer three times at 20-min intervals. IB use was determined by the physicians' treatment policy. Propensity score matching was used to adjust the confounding factors related to IB administration.

RESULTS:

Of the 158 patients, 88 were treated with IB and 70 were treated without IB. A propensity score-matching analysis extracted 54 patients from each group. We found no statistical difference in the admission rate of the two groups (IB group 25.9% vs non-IB group 31.5%; P = 0.67). The post-treatment modified pulmonary index scores (mean ± SD) were also similar (IB 6.6 ± 2.0 vs non-IB 6.3 ± 2.5; P = 0.53). Only one patient (1.0%) treated with IB experienced vomiting, which resolved spontaneously.

CONCLUSION:

The metered-dose inhaler IB was ineffective in reducing the admission rate possibly because it was less effective than a nebulizer for IB inhalation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Broncodilatadores / Ipratrópio / Inaladores Dosimetrados Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma / Broncodilatadores / Ipratrópio / Inaladores Dosimetrados Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Limite: Child / Child, preschool / Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article