Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Impact of adjuvant treatment and prognostic factors in stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma patients treated in Commission on Cancer®-accredited facilities.
Vaz, Jennifer; Tian, Chunqiao; Richardson, Michael T; Chan, John K; Mysona, David; Rao, Uma N; Powell, Matthew A; Shriver, Craig D; Hamilton, Chad A; Casablanca, Yovanni; Maxwell, G Larry; Darcy, Kathleen M.
Afiliação
  • Vaz J; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA. Electronic address: jenn.vaz@gmail.com.
  • Tian C; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA. Elect
  • Richardson MT; Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, CA, USA. Electronic address: mtr1@stanford.edu.
  • Chan JK; Palo Alto Medical Foundation, California Pacific Medical Center, Sutter Health, San Francisco, CA, USA. Electronic address: chanjohn@sutterhealth.org.
  • Mysona D; Medical College of Georgia and College of Allied Health Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, GA, USA. Electronic address: David.Mysona@unchealth.unc.edu.
  • Rao UN; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA; Depar
  • Powell MA; Division of Gynecologic Oncology and Siteman Cancer Center, Washington University, St Louis, MO, USA. Electronic address: mpowell@wustl.edu.
  • Shriver CD; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Bethesda, MD, USA. Electronic address: craig.d.shriver.civ@mail.mil.
  • Hamilton CA; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Mu
  • Casablanca Y; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Murtha Cancer Center Research Program, Department of Surgery, Uniformed Services Universit
  • Maxwell GL; Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, Inova Fairfax Hospital, Falls Church, VA, USA; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; John P Mu
  • Darcy KM; Gynecologic Cancer Center of Excellence, Department of Obstetrics & Gynecology, Uniformed Services University of the Health Sciences, Walter Reed National Military Medical Center, Bethesda, MD, USA; The Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA; John
Gynecol Oncol ; 157(1): 121-130, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31954536
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

Determine the impact of adjuvant chemotherapy (ACT) and prognostic factors in surgically managed patients with stage I uterine leiomyosarcoma (ULMS).

METHODS:

Women who underwent hysterectomy and were diagnosed with stage I ULMS between 2010 and 2014 in the National Cancer Database were eligible for this observation study. Inverse probability of treatment weighting based on propensity score was used to balance clinical characteristics between ACT and no ACT patients. Hazard ratio (HR) and 95% confidence interval (CI) were estimated from Cox modeling.

RESULTS:

There were 1059 eligible patients with stage I ULMS including 514 treated with ACT and 545 with no ACT. Patient characteristics and tumor features varied in patients treated with ACT vs. no ACT (P < .0001). Multivariate survival analysis demonstrated that patient age, comorbidity score, tumor size, lymphovascular space invasion (LVSI) and grade were independent prognostic factors. After propensity score weighting to control for imbalance of prognostic clinical factors, adjusted five-year survival was 61.7% vs. 61.3% and restricted mean survival time was 39.7 vs. 40.6 months for ACT vs. no ACT, respectively. Risk of death in a weighted Cox analysis of overall survival was similar (HR = 1.08, 95% CI = 0.85-1.37, P = .054) for ACT vs. no ACT patients. Subset analysis demonstrated that survival was similar in ACT vs. no ACT patients categorized by age, tumor size and LVSI or with high grade or ungraded tumors. In contrast, patients with low grade tumors had worse 5-year survival (82.3% vs. 91.5%) and an increased risk of death (HR = 3.79, 95% CI = 1.15-12.40, P = .028) following ACT vs. no ACT.

CONCLUSIONS:

ACT did not improve survival over no ACT in patients with stage I ULMS and was inferior in patients with low grade tumors.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Leiomiossarcoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Uterinas / Leiomiossarcoma Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article