Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Cost-effectiveness of a mobile health-supported lifestyle intervention for pregnant women with an elevated body mass index.
O'Sullivan, Elizabeth J; Rokicki, Slawa; Kennelly, Maria; Ainscough, Kate; McAuliffe, Fionnuala M.
Afiliação
  • O'Sullivan EJ; UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Rokicki S; School of Biological and Health Sciences, Technological University Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Kennelly M; Geary Institute for Public Policy, University College Dublin, Dublin, Ireland.
  • Ainscough K; Department of Health Behavior, Society, and Policy, Rutgers School of Public Health, Piscataway, United States.
  • McAuliffe FM; UCD Perinatal Research Centre, School of Medicine, University College Dublin, National Maternity Hospital Ireland, Dublin, Ireland.
Int J Obes (Lond) ; 44(5): 999-1010, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965073
OBJECTIVE: To assess the cost-effectiveness of a mobile health-supported lifestyle intervention compared with usual care. METHODS: We conducted a cost-effectiveness analysis from the perspective of the publicly-funded health care system. We estimated costs associated with the intervention and health care utilisation from first antenatal care appointment through delivery. We used bootstrap methods to quantify the uncertainty around cost-effectiveness estimates. Health outcomes assessed in this analysis were gestational weight gain (GWG; kg), incidence of excessive GWG, quality-adjusted life years (QALYs), and incidence of large-for-gestational-age (LGA). Incremental cost-effectiveness ratios (ICERs) were calculated as cost per QALY gained, cost per kg of GWG avoided, cost per case of excessive GWG averted, and cost per case of LGA averted. RESULTS: Total mean cost including intervention and health care utilisation was €3745 in the intervention group and €3471 in the control group (mean difference €274, P = 0.08). The ICER was €2914 per QALY gained. Assuming a ceiling ratio of €45,000, the probability that the intervention was cost-effective based on QALYs was 79%. Cost per kg of GWG avoided was €209. The cost-effectiveness acceptability curve (CEAC) for kg of GWG avoided reached a confidence level of 95% at €905, indicating that if one is willing to pay a maximum of an additional €905 per kg of GWG avoided, there is a 95% probability that the intervention is cost-effective. Costs per case of excessive GWG averted and case of LGA averted were €2117 and €5911, respectively. The CEAC for case of excessive GWG averted and for case of LGA averted reached a confidence level of 95% at €7090 and €25,737, respectively. CONCLUSIONS: Results suggest that a mobile-health lifestyle intervention could be cost-effective; however, a better understanding of the short- and long-term costs of LGA and excessive GWG is necessary to confirm the results.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidado Pré-Natal / Resultado da Gravidez / Telemedicina / Obesidade Materna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cuidado Pré-Natal / Resultado da Gravidez / Telemedicina / Obesidade Materna Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article