Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Acetabular positioning is more consistent with the use of a novel miniature computer-assisted device.
Jacob, Ivan; Benson, Jessica; Shanaghan, Kate; Gonzalez Della Valle, Alejandro.
Afiliação
  • Jacob I; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Benson J; Intellijoint Surgical Inc., Waterloo, ON, Canada.
  • Shanaghan K; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA.
  • Gonzalez Della Valle A; Department of Orthopaedic Surgery, Hospital for Special Surgery, 535 East 70th Street, New York, NY, 10021, USA. gonzaleza@hss.edu.
Int Orthop ; 44(3): 429-435, 2020 03.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31965312
INTRODUCTION: Computer-assisted surgery (CAS) relying on registration of the anterior pelvic plane (APP) allows precise acetabular component placement. We determined the variability of cup placement in patients who underwent THA with and without the use of CAS that does not rely on the registration of APP. METHODS: Fifty-one patients who underwent staged-bilateral THAs, one without CAS (control), and a subsequent one with CAS (study group), were included. Acetabular inclination and anteversion were measured on standardized post-operative radiographs. Variance in cup position and Lewinnek's zone proportionality were compared between the groups. Multiple regressions were performed to identify factors affecting variability in acetabular component placement. RESULTS: The mean inclination for the control and study group was 42.7° (SD 4.5) and 42.5° (SD 2.9), respectively. The inclination variance was 20.5° and 8.2° respectively (p = < 0.001). Cup inclination was more consistent in the study than in the control group (deviation from the mean: 2.3° vs. 3.8°, p < 0.001). The mean anteversion for the control and the study group was 25.5° (SD 7.4) and 26.8° (SD 4.3), respectively. The anteversion variance was 54.2° and 18.2° respectively (p = <0.001). Consistency in cup anteversion was significantly improved with CAS (deviation from the mean: 3.4° vs. 5.8°; p = 0.002). Lewinnek's zone proportionality was not affected by the use of  CAS. In the linear regression analysis, CAS significantly increased consistency in cup inclination (p = 0.01). Patient's factors including BMI and laterality affected consistency of cup placement. CONCLUSION: CAS without referencing the APP allows a more consistent orientation of the acetabular component when compared to freehand placement.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Quadril / Artroplastia de Quadril / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Acetábulo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Quadril / Artroplastia de Quadril / Cirurgia Assistida por Computador / Acetábulo Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article