Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Parental Perspectives: Identifying Profiles of Parental Attitudes and Barriers Related to Diabetes Device Use.
Wong, Jessie J; Barley, Regan C; Hanes, Sarah; Tanenbaum, Molly L; Lanning, Monica; Naranjo, Diana; Hood, Korey K.
Afiliação
  • Wong JJ; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Barley RC; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Hanes S; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Tanenbaum ML; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Lanning M; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Naranjo D; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
  • Hood KK; Division of Endocrinology and Diabetes, Department of Pediatrics, Stanford University School of Medicine, Stanford, California.
Diabetes Technol Ther ; 22(9): 674-680, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31971451
ABSTRACT

Background:

Despite the demonstrated benefits of diabetes device use, uptake of insulin pumps and continuous glucose monitors (CGMs) remains quite low. The current study aimed to identify profiles of parents of youth with type 1 diabetes based on their attitudes toward diabetes-specific technology and barriers to diabetes technology uptake.

Methods:

Online survey data were collected from 471 parents in the T1D Exchange Clinic Network (child's age = 12.0 ± 3.2 years; diabetes duration = 7.0 ± 2.9 years; A1c = 8.4% ± 1.3; 75% using insulin pump; 27% using CGM).

Results:

K-means cluster analyses revealed five parent profiles Embracers (50.7%), Burdened (15.7%), Hopeful but Hassled (14.2%), Distrusting (12.7%), and Data Minimalists (6.6%). ANOVAs and chi-square tests identified differences between groups based on diabetes distress, worry over hypoglycemia, device use, and demographic characteristics.

Conclusions:

Providers encouraging device uptake may benefit from tailoring their approaches based on these distinct groups and their corresponding concerns and needs.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina / Atitude / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pais / Sistemas de Infusão de Insulina / Atitude / Diabetes Mellitus Tipo 1 Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Child / Child, preschool / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article