Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Measuring quality of life in bariatric surgery: a multicentre study.
Poelemeijer, Youri Q M; van der Knaap, Elise T W; Marang-van de Mheen, Perla J; Demirkiran, Ahmet; Wiezer, Marinus J; Hazebroek, Eric J; Greve, Jan Willem M; Liem, Ronald S L.
Afiliação
  • Poelemeijer YQM; Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands. Y.Q.M.Poelemeijer@lumc.nl.
  • van der Knaap ETW; Department of Surgery, Leiden University Medical Center, Albinusdreef 2, 2333 ZA, Leiden, The Netherlands. Y.Q.M.Poelemeijer@lumc.nl.
  • Marang-van de Mheen PJ; Scientific Bureau, Dutch Institute for Clinical Auditing, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Demirkiran A; Department of Biomedical Data Science, Leiden University Medical Center, Leiden, The Netherlands.
  • Wiezer MJ; Department of Surgery, Rode Kruis Hospital, Beverwijk, The Netherlands.
  • Hazebroek EJ; Department of Surgery, St. Antonius Hospital, Nieuwegein, The Netherlands.
  • Greve JWM; Department of Surgery, Rijnstate, Arnhem, The Netherlands.
  • Liem RSL; Department of Surgery, Zuyderland Medical Center, Heerlen, The Netherlands.
Surg Endosc ; 34(12): 5522-5532, 2020 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-31993820
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Current studies mainly focus on total weight loss and comorbidity reduction. Only a few studies compare Quality of Life (QoL) after sleeve gastrectomy (SG) and Roux-en-Y gastric bypass (RYGB). This study was conducted to examine the extent of improvement in QoL on different domains after primary bariatric surgery and compare these results to Dutch reference values.

METHODS:

The study included prospectively collected data from patients who underwent primary bariatric surgery in five Dutch hospitals. The RAND-36 questionnaire was used to measure the patient's QoL; preoperatively and twelve months postoperatively. Postoperative scores were compared to Dutch reference values, standardized for age, using t-test. A difference of more than 5% was considered a minimal important difference. A multivariate linear regression analysis was used to compare SG and RYGB on the extent of improvement, adjusted for case-mix factors.

RESULTS:

In total, 4864 patients completed both the pre- and postoperative questionnaire. Compared with Dutch reference values, patients postoperatively reported clinically relevant better physical functioning (RYGB + 6.8%), physical role limitations (SG + 5.6%; RYGB + 6.2%) and health change (SG + 77.1%; RYGB + 80.0%), but worse general health perception (SG - 22.8%; RYGB - 17.0%). Improvement in QoL was similar between SG and RYGB, except for physical functioning (ß 2.758; p-value 0.008) and general health perception (ß 2.607; p-value < 0.001) for which RYGB patients improved more.

CONCLUSIONS:

SG and RYGB patients achieved a better postoperative score in physical functioning, physical role limitations and health change compared to Dutch reference values, and a worse score in general health perception.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Cirurgia Bariátrica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Qualidade de Vida / Cirurgia Bariátrica Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Qualitative_research Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article