Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of a human monoclonal antibody targeting the G glycoprotein of henipaviruses in healthy adults: a first-in-human, randomised, controlled, phase 1 study.
Playford, Elliott Geoffrey; Munro, Trent; Mahler, Stephen M; Elliott, Suzanne; Gerometta, Michael; Hoger, Kym L; Jones, Martina L; Griffin, Paul; Lynch, Kathleen D; Carroll, Heidi; El Saadi, Debra; Gilmour, Margaret E; Hughes, Benjamin; Hughes, Karen; Huang, Edwin; de Bakker, Christopher; Klein, Reuben; Scher, Mark G; Smith, Ina L; Wang, Lin-Fa; Lambert, Stephen B; Dimitrov, Dimiter S; Gray, Peter P; Broder, Christopher C.
Afiliação
  • Playford EG; Infection Management Services, Princess Alexandra Hospital, Brisbane, QLD, Australia; School of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia. Electronic address: geoffrey.Playford@health.qld.gov.au.
  • Munro T; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Mahler SM; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia; ARC Training Centre for Biopharmaceutical Innovation, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Elliott S; Q-Pharm, Clive Berghofer Cancer Research Centre, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Gerometta M; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Hoger KL; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Jones ML; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia; ARC Training Centre for Biopharmaceutical Innovation, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Griffin P; Q-Pharm, Clive Berghofer Cancer Research Centre, Herston, QLD, Australia; Clinical Tropical Medicine Laboratory, QIMR Berghofer Medical Research Institute, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Lynch KD; Child Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Communicable Disease Branch, Prevention Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Carroll H; Communicable Disease Branch, Prevention Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • El Saadi D; Communicable Disease Branch, Prevention Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Gilmour ME; Q-Pharm, Clive Berghofer Cancer Research Centre, Herston, QLD, Australia.
  • Hughes B; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Hughes K; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Huang E; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • de Bakker C; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Klein R; Health and Biosecurity Business Unit, CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Scher MG; Henry M Jackson Foundation for the Advancement of Military Medicine, Bethesda, MD, USA.
  • Smith IL; Health and Biosecurity Business Unit, CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia.
  • Wang LF; Health and Biosecurity Business Unit, CSIRO Australian Animal Health Laboratory, Geelong, VIC, Australia; Programme in Emerging Infectious Diseases, Duke-National University Medical School, Singapore.
  • Lambert SB; Child Health Research Centre, Faculty of Medicine, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia; Communicable Disease Branch, Prevention Division, Queensland Health, Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Dimitrov DS; Center for Antibody Therapeutics, University of Pittsburgh Medical School, Pittsburgh, PA, USA.
  • Gray PP; Australian Institute for Bioengineering and Nanotechnology, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia; ARC Training Centre for Biopharmaceutical Innovation, University of Queensland Brisbane, QLD, Australia.
  • Broder CC; Department of Microbiology and Immunology, Uniformed Services University, Bethesda, MD, USA.
Lancet Infect Dis ; 20(4): 445-454, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32027842
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The monoclonal antibody m102.4 is a potent, fully human antibody that neutralises Hendra and Nipah viruses in vitro and in vivo. We aimed to investigate the safety, tolerability, pharmacokinetics, and immunogenicity of m102.4 in healthy adults.

METHODS:

In this double-blind, placebo-controlled, single-centre, dose-escalation, phase 1 trial of m102.4, we randomly assigned healthy adults aged 18-50 years with a body-mass index of 18·0-35·0 kg/m2 to one of five cohorts. A sentinel pair for each cohort was randomly assigned to either m102.4 or placebo. The remaining participants in each cohort were randomly assigned (51) to receive m102.4 or placebo. Cohorts 1-4 received a single intravenous infusion of m102.4 at doses of 1 mg/kg (cohort 1), 3 mg/kg (cohort 2), 10 mg/kg (cohort 3), and 20 mg/kg (cohort 4), and were monitored for 113 days. Cohort 5 received two infusions of 20 mg/kg 72 h apart and were monitored for 123 days. The primary outcomes were safety and tolerability. Secondary outcomes were pharmacokinetics and immunogenicity. Analyses were completed according to protocol. The study was registered on the Australian New Zealand Clinical Trials Registry, ACTRN12615000395538.

FINDINGS:

Between March 27, 2015, and June 16, 2016, 40 (52%) of 77 healthy screened adults were enrolled in the study. Eight participants were assigned to each cohort (six received m102.4 and two received placebo). 86 treatment-emergent adverse events were reported, with similar rates between placebo and treatment groups. The most common treatment-related event was headache (12 [40%] of 30 participants in the combined m102.4 group, and three [30%] of ten participants in the pooled placebo group). No deaths or severe adverse events leading to study discontinuation occurred. Pharmacokinetics based on those receiving m102.4 (n=30) were linear, with a median half-life of 663·3 h (range 474·3-735·1) for cohort 1, 466·3 h (382·8-522·3) for cohort 2, 397·0 h (333·9-491·8) for cohort 3, and 466·7 h (351·0-889·6) for cohort 4. The elimination kinetics of those receiving repeated dosing (cohort 5) were similar to those of single-dose recipients (median elimination half-time 472·0 [385·6-592·0]). Anti-m102.4 antibodies were not detected at any time-point during the study.

INTERPRETATION:

Single and repeated dosing of m102.4 were well tolerated and safe, displayed linear pharmacokinetics, and showed no evidence of an immunogenic response. This study will inform future dosing regimens for m102.4 to achieve prolonged exposure for systemic efficacy to prevent and treat henipavirus infections.

FUNDING:

Queensland Department of Health, the National Health and Medical Research Council, and the National Hendra Virus Research Program.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Segurança / Glicoproteínas / Henipavirus / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Voluntários Saudáveis / Imunogenicidade da Vacina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Segurança / Glicoproteínas / Henipavirus / Anticorpos Monoclonais Humanizados / Voluntários Saudáveis / Imunogenicidade da Vacina Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Etiology_studies / Guideline Limite: Adult / Female / Humans / Male País como assunto: Oceania Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article