Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Value-based care for the treatment and evaluation of benign prostatic hyperplasia: an analysis of a metropolitan service area claims database.
Webb, Jack C; Valencia, Victoria E; Wenzel, Jessica; Patel, Anish; Wolf, J Stuart; Osterberg, E Charles.
Afiliação
  • Webb JC; The University of Texas At Austin-Dell Medical School, Austin, USA. Jack_Webb@utexas.edu.
  • Valencia VE; The University of Texas At Austin-Dell Medical School, Austin, USA.
  • Wenzel J; The University of Texas At Austin-Dell Medical School, Austin, USA.
  • Patel A; The University of Texas At Austin-Dell Medical School, Austin, USA.
  • Wolf JS; The University of Texas At Austin-Dell Medical School, Austin, USA.
  • Osterberg EC; The University of Texas At Austin-Dell Medical School, Austin, USA.
World J Urol ; 38(12): 3245-3250, 2020 Dec.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32048013
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

With an aging population, cost containment and improved outcomes will be crucial for a sustainable healthcare ecosystem. Current data demonstrate great variation in payments for procedures and diagnostic workup of benign prostatic hyperplasia (BPH). To help determine the best financial value in BPH care, we sought to analyze the major drivers of total payments in BPH. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Commercial and Medicare claims from the Truven Health Analytics Markestscan® database for the Austin, Texas Metropolitan Service Area from 2012 to 2014 were queried for encounters with diagnosis and procedural codes related to BPH. Linear regression was utilized to assess factors related to BPH-related payments. Payments were then compared between surgical patients and patients managed with medication alone.

RESULTS:

Major drivers of total payments in BPH care were operative, namely transurethral resection of prostate (TURP) [$2778, 95% CI ($2385-$3171), p < 0.001) and photoselective vaporization (PVP) ($3315, 95% CI ($2781-$3849) p < 0.001). Most office procedures were also associated with significantly higher payments, including cystoscopy [$708, 95% CI ($417-$999), p < 0.001], uroflometry [$446, 95% CI ($225-668), p < 0.001], urinalysis [$167, 95% CI ($32-$302), p = 0.02], postvoid residual (PVR) [$245, 95% CI ($83-$407), p < 0.001], and urodynamics [$1251, 95% CI ($405-2097), p < 0.001]. Patients who had surgery had lower payments for their medications compared to patients who had no surgery [$120 (IQR $0, $550) vs. $532 (IQR $231, $1852), respectively, p < 0.001].

CONCLUSION:

Surgery and office-based procedures are associated with increased payments for BPH treatment. Although payments for surgery were more in total, surgical patients paid significantly less for BPH medications.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Seguro de Saúde Baseado em Valor Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Hiperplasia Prostática / Seguro de Saúde Baseado em Valor Tipo de estudo: Evaluation_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Male / Middle aged País como assunto: America do norte Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article