Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
How does the WHO Surgical Safety Checklist fit with existing perioperative risk management strategies? An ethnographic study across surgical specialties.
Wæhle, Hilde Valen; Haugen, Arvid Steinar; Wiig, Siri; Søfteland, Eirik; Sevdalis, Nick; Harthug, Stig.
Afiliação
  • Wæhle HV; Department of Research and Development, Haukeland University Hospital, Jonas Liesvei 65, N-5021, Bergen, Norway. hilde.valen.waehle@helse-bergen.no.
  • Haugen AS; Department of Clinical Science, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway. hilde.valen.waehle@helse-bergen.no.
  • Wiig S; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Søfteland E; Centre for Resilience in Healthcare (SHARE), Faculty of Health Sciences, University of Stavanger, Stavanger, Norway.
  • Sevdalis N; Department of Anaesthesia and Intensive Care, Haukeland University Hospital, Bergen, Norway.
  • Harthug S; Department of Clinical Medicine, Faculty of Medicine, University of Bergen, Bergen, Norway.
BMC Health Serv Res ; 20(1): 111, 2020 Feb 12.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32050960
BACKGROUND: The World Health Organization (WHO) Surgical Safety Checklist (SSC) has demonstrated beneficial impacts on a range of patient- and team outcomes, though variation in SSC implementation and staff's perception of it remain challenging. Precisely how frontline personnel integrate the SSC with pre-existing perioperative clinical risk management remains underexplored - yet likely an impactful factor on how SSC is being used and its potential to improve clinical safety. This study aimed to explore how members of the multidisciplinary perioperative team integrate the SSC within their risk management strategies. METHODS: An ethnographic case study including observations (40 h) in operating theatres and in-depth interviews of 17 perioperative team members was carried out at two hospitals in 2016. Data were analysed using content analysis. RESULTS: We identified three themes reflecting the integration of the SSC in daily surgical practice: 1) Perceived usefullness; implying an intuitive advantage assessment of the SSC's practical utility in relation to relevant work; 2) Modification of implementation; reflecting performance variability of SSC on confirmation of items due to precence of team members; barriers of performance; and definition of SSC as performance indicator, and 3) Communication outside of the checklist; including formal- and informal micro-team formations where detailed, specific risk communication unfolded. CONCLUSION: When the SSC is not integrated within existing risk management strategies, but perceived as an "add on", its fidelity is compromised, hence limiting its potential clinical effectiveness. Implementation strategies for the SSC should thus integrate it as a risk-management tool and include it as part of risk-management education and training. This can improve team learning around risk comunication, foster mutual understanding of safety perspectives and enhance SSC implementation.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos / Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Assistência Perioperatória / Lista de Checagem Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Gestão de Riscos / Especialidades Cirúrgicas / Assistência Perioperatória / Lista de Checagem Tipo de estudo: Etiology_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Female / Humans / Male Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article