Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
The accuracy of Cobb angle measurement on CT scan projection radiograph images.
Alrehily, F; Hogg, P; Twiste, M; Johansen, S; Tootell, A.
Afiliação
  • Alrehily F; College of Applied Medical Sciences, Taibah University, Medina, 42353, Saudi Arabia; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom. Electronic address: f.alrehily@edu.salford.ac.uk.
  • Hogg P; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.
  • Twiste M; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.
  • Johansen S; Oslo Metropolitan University, Faculty of Health Sciences, Norway; Department of Oncology, Division of Cancer Medicine, Surgery and Transplantation, Oslo University Hospital, Radiumhospitalet, Oslo, Norway.
  • Tootell A; School of Health and Society, University of Salford, Salford, M5 4WT, United Kingdom.
Radiography (Lond) ; 26(2): e73-e77, 2020 05.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32052770
ABSTRACT

INTRODUCTION:

Adolescent idiopathic scoliosis (AIS) is a spinal deformity that can affect young children. It requires frequent exposure to X-rays to monitor the deformity, which can lead to the development of radiation-induced cancer later in life. The aim of this study is to test the accuracy of using scan projection radiography (SPR) in computed tomography (CT) scans for AIS assessment. This scanning mode delivers low radiation compared with conventional radiography.

METHOD:

A bespoke phantom with a 14° scoliotic spine was scanned in CT SPR mode using 18 imaging acquisitions. These images were visually evaluated against set criteria to determine their suitability for Cobb angle measurements Those deemed of insufficient quality were excluded from the study (n = 8, excluded). Cobb angle measurements were then performed on the remaining images (n = 10, included) by 13 observers.

RESULTS:

On average, the difference between the measured Cobb angle and the known angle was -2.75° (SD 1.46°). The agreement between the observers was good (p = 0.861, 95% CI 0.70-0.95) and comparable to similar studies on other imaging modalities which are used for Cobb angle estimation.

CONCLUSION:

CT SPR images can be used for AIS assessment with the 5° margin of error that is clinically acceptable. IMPLICATIONS FOR PRACTICE The outcome is promising for patients and health providers because it provides an opportunity to reduce patient dose, achieve clinically acceptable Cobb angle measurements whilst using existing (CT) technology that is available in most hospital.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Escoliose / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Limite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Doses de Radiação / Escoliose / Tomografia Computadorizada por Raios X Limite: Adolescent / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article