Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Current Bronchodilator Responsiveness Criteria Underestimate Asthma in Older Adults.
Cavallazzi, Rodrigo S; Polivka, Barbara J; Beatty, Bryan L; Antimisiaris, Demetra E; Gopalraj, Rangaraj K; Vickers-Smith, Rachel A; Folz, Rodney J.
Afiliação
  • Cavallazzi RS; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, and Sleep Disorders University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Polivka BJ; School of Nursing, University of Kansas, Kansas City, Kansas. bpolivka@kumc.edu.
  • Beatty BL; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care Medicine, and Sleep Disorders University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Antimisiaris DE; Department of Health Management & Systems Science, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Gopalraj RK; Norton Healthcare, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Vickers-Smith RA; School of Nursing, University of Louisville, Louisville, Kentucky.
  • Folz RJ; Division of Pulmonary, Critical Care, and Sleep Medicine University Hospital Cleveland Medical Center and Case Western Reserve University.
Respir Care ; 65(8): 1104-1111, 2020 Aug.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32071132
BACKGROUND: Asthma is common in older adults and is confirmed by demonstration of variable expiratory air-flow limitations, typically evaluated by spirometric assessment of bronchodilator responsiveness. However, many patients with clinically suspected asthma and documented air-flow obstruction do not exhibit a post-bronchodilator response that meets or exceeds current established guidelines. We investigated if extending the time from bronchodilator administration to assessment of bronchodilator response increases the yield of spirometry for the diagnosis of asthma in older adults. METHODS: This was a cross-sectional study. The subjects were non-smokers, ≥ 60 y old, and with suspected asthma. Subjects were characterized as (1) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, (2) those with a positive bronchodilator response on the 60-min post-bronchodilator spirometry, and (3) those without a positive bronchodilator response but with a positive methacholine challenge test. Factors associated with a late response to bronchodilator were evaluated by using bivariate analysis and by multivariate analysis by using a logistic regression model. RESULTS: This study enrolled 165 subjects. Of these, 81 (49.1%) had a positive bronchodilator response on 30-min post-bronchodilator spirometry; 25 (15.2%) had a positive bronchodilator response on the 1-h post-bronchodilator spirometry; and 59 (35.8%) had no positive bronchodilator response but had a positive methacholine challenge test. On multivariable regression analysis, those with a higher baseline percentage of predicted FEV1, higher scores on a standard asthma control test, and wheezing and/or cough after exercise were more likely to either have a late bronchodilator response or no bronchodilator response. CONCLUSIONS: Our study showed that a late positive response to bronchodilator use was more common than previously presumed in older subjects with suspected asthma. Pulmonary function testing laboratories should consider routinely reassessing spirometry at 1 h after bronchodilator use if the earlier assessment did not reveal a significant response.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Asma Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prevalence_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Humans / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article