Modified percutaneous internal ring suturing with peritoneal injury in children: matched comparison to open hernia repair.

ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND: The aim of this study was to elucidate the outcomes of percutaneous internal ring suture (PIRS) technique for inguinal hernia repair augmented with thermal peritoneal injury compared to open inguinal hernia repair (OHR) in a large population of contemporary pediatric patients. Thermal injury with PIRS has been shown to reduce recurrence in animal models and is increasingly being incorporated into clinical practice. METHODS: Retrospective review of all PIRS procedures and OHR between Jan-2017 to Sept-2018 was performed. Data regarding patient characteristics, characteristics of the hernia, operative details, postoperative complications, and recurrence were collected. Non-parametric tests were used and p < 0.05 was regarded as statistically significant. 11 Propensity score matching was performed using "nearest-score" technique. Matching was done based on age, sex, follow-up time, side of hernia, repair of contralateral hernia, and number of additional procedures. RESULTS: 90 modified PIRS patients were matched to 90 OHRs. Patient demographics, hernia characteristics, and follow-up time were similar between the two groups after matching. There were no differences in recurrence rates (1 vs. 3 in OHR and PIRS, respectively, p = 0.6), complication rates (1 vs. 4 in OHR and PIRS, respectively, p = 0.4), and OR time [44.5 vs. 43 min in OHR and PIRS, respectively, p = 0.8]. There were no intraoperative complications for either technique. For OHR, laparoscopic look was performed in 23%. When successful, it revealed a contralateral PPV (patent processus vaginalis-PPV) in 41% of cases (9.4% of all OHR), all of which were repaired. For the PIRS procedures, a contralateral PPV was found in 25.6%, all of which were repaired. In the unmatched population, OHR had a metachronous hernia rate of 1.8%, none of whom had the contralateral PPV repaired at the original procedure. CONCLUSIONS: PIRS with peritoneal injury has comparable efficacy and good safety compared to OHR. Recurrence and complication rates should further improve with increasing experience. Future studies should elucidate long term outcomes.