Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Comparison of fin whale 20 Hz call detections by deep-water mobile autonomous and stationary recorders.
Fregosi, Selene; Harris, Danielle V; Matsumoto, Haruyoshi; Mellinger, David K; Negretti, Christina; Moretti, David J; Martin, Stephen W; Matsuyama, Brian; Dugan, Peter J; Klinck, Holger.
Afiliação
  • Fregosi S; Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Oregon State University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 2030 Southeast Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365, USA.
  • Harris DV; Centre for Research into Ecological and Environmental Modelling, University of St Andrews, St Andrews, Fife, United Kingdom.
  • Matsumoto H; Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Oregon State University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 2030 Southeast Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365, USA.
  • Mellinger DK; Cooperative Institute for Marine Resources Studies, Oregon State University and National Oceanic and Atmospheric Administration Pacific Marine Environmental Laboratory, 2030 Southeast Marine Science Drive, Newport, Oregon 97365, USA.
  • Negretti C; Department of Animal and Rangeland Sciences, College of Agricultural Sciences, Oregon State University, Corvallis, Oregon 97331, USA.
  • Moretti DJ; Naval Undersea Warfare Center, Newport, Rhode Island 02841, USA.
  • Martin SW; National Marine Mammal Foundation, San Diego, California 92106, USA.
  • Matsuyama B; National Marine Mammal Foundation, San Diego, California 92106, USA.
  • Dugan PJ; Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA.
  • Klinck H; Center for Conservation Bioacoustics, Cornell Lab of Ornithology, Cornell University, Ithaca, New York 14850, USA.
J Acoust Soc Am ; 147(2): 961, 2020 02.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32113295
ABSTRACT
Acoustically equipped deep-water mobile autonomous platforms can be used to survey for marine mammals over intermediate spatiotemporal scales. Direct comparisons to fixed recorders are necessary to evaluate these tools as passive acoustic monitoring platforms. One glider and two drifting deep-water floats were simultaneously deployed within a deep-water cabled hydrophone array to quantitatively assess their survey capabilities. The glider was able to follow a pre-defined track while float movement was somewhat unpredictable. Fin whale (Balaenoptera physalus) 20 Hz pulses were recorded by all hydrophones throughout the two-week deployment. Calls were identified using a template detector, which performed similarly across recorder types. The glider data contained up to 78% fewer detections per hour due to increased low-frequency flow noise present during glider descents. The glider performed comparably to the floats and fixed recorders at coarser temporal scales; hourly and daily presence of detections did not vary by recorder type. Flow noise was related to glider speed through water and dive state. Glider speeds through water of 25 cm/s or less are suggested to minimize flow noise and the importance of glider ballasting, detector characterization, and normalization by effort when interpreting glider-collected data and applying it to marine mammal density estimation are discussed.

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article