Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Analysis of Scars and Keloids by Focused Ion Beam/Scanning Electron Microscopy: Distinguishing Between Hypertrophic Scars and Keloids.
Migita, Hisashi; Rikimaru, Hideaki; Rikimaru-Nishi, Yukiko; Koga, Noriyuki; Watanabe, Koichi; Ohta, Keisuke; Nakamura, Kei-Ichiro; Kiyokawa, Kensuke.
Afiliação
  • Migita H; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery.
  • Rikimaru H; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery.
  • Ohta K; Division of Microscopic and Developmental Anatomy, Department of Anatomy.
  • Nakamura KI; Division of Microscopic and Developmental Anatomy, Department of Anatomy.
  • Kiyokawa K; From the Department of Plastic and Reconstructive Surgery and Maxillofacial Surgery.
Ann Plast Surg ; 84(4): 379-384, 2020 04.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32118630
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Histological differentiation between hypertrophic scars (HSs) and keloids has been considered difficult. In this study, we analyzed differences in the 3-dimensional tissue architecture between HSs and keloids using focused ion beam/scanning electron microscopy (FIB/SEM).

METHODS:

Five specimens each of normal skin, normotrophic scars (NSs), HSs, and keloids were investigated. Three sites in each specimen were observed by FIB/SEM tomography, resulting in an observation of 15 sites per tissue type. We identified fibroblasts and macrophages and assessed the contact ratio and the mode of intercellular contact (planar contact or point contact). The significance of differences among the 4 tissue types was determined by Fisher exact test.

RESULTS:

In normal skin, contact between fibroblasts and macrophages was observed at all 15 sites, and the mode of contact was always planar. There was contact at 87% of the NS sites (planar point = 80% 7%). In HSs, contact was seen at 80% of the sites (planar point = 20% 60%). In keloids, contact was found at only 15% of the sites (planar point = 7.5% 7.5%). The intercellular contact ratio showed no significant differences among normal skin, NSs, and HSs; however, a significant difference was noted between these tissues and keloids. The intercellular contact mode also showed no significant difference between normal skin and NSs, but a significant difference between these tissues and HSs.

CONCLUSIONS:

These histopathologic findings suggest that FIB/SEM tomography is useful for distinguishing between HSs and keloids and can provide important knowledge for understanding the pathogenesis of keloids.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatriz Hipertrófica / Queloide Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Cicatriz Hipertrófica / Queloide Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article