Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
One-year follow-up of efficacy and cost of repeated doses versus single larger dose of intra-articular hyaluronic acid for knee osteoarthritis.
Suppan, Vijaya Kumar L; Tew, Mei Mei; Wong, Bor Chern; Chan, Huan Keat; Chew, Yu Wei; Tan, Chin Siong; Nanta Kumar, Vijay Kumar; Shafie, Asrul Akmal; Sadashiva Rao, Ashutosh.
Afiliação
  • Suppan VKL; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Tew MM; Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Wong BC; Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Chan HK; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Chew YW; Clinical Research Centre, Hospital Sultanah Bahiyah, Alor Setar, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Tan CS; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Nanta Kumar VK; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Shafie AA; Department of Orthopaedics, Hospital Sultan Abdul Halim, Sungai Petani, Kedah, Malaysia.
  • Sadashiva Rao A; School of Pharmaceutical Science, Universiti Sains Malaysia, Gelugor, Penang, Malaysia.
J Orthop Surg (Hong Kong) ; 28(1): 2309499019895029, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32129141
PURPOSE: A recent 3-month randomized, open-label controlled trial found that the intra-articular hyaluronic acid injection (GO-ON®) given as a single dose of 5 mL is as effective and safe as three repeated doses of 2.5 mL in patients with knee osteoarthritis. However, the information on the long-term efficacy and economic implications of the single-dose regimen is still limited. Hence, this follow-up study was designed to compare the effectiveness and costs of the two regimens 12 months following the treatment. METHODS: All the 127 patients, who received either three repeated doses (n = 64) or a single dose (n = 63) of GO-ON in the previous trial, were followed up in month 12 following the treatment. The effectiveness of both the regimens was assessed using the Western Ontario and McMaster Universities Osteoarthritis Index (WOMAC), and the mean WOMAC scores were compared with those recorded at the baseline and in month 3. Additionally, the total treatment costs of the two regimens, taking account of both direct and indirect costs, were computed and compared. RESULTS: A total of 125 patients (98.4%) completed the assessment. Despite the reduction of the overall mean WOMAC score from 39.24 to 19.93 (p < 0.001) in the first 3 months following the treatment with GO-ON, no further changes were observed up to month 12 (p > 0.95). In the meantime, the two regimens did not differ in the mean WOMAC scores (p = 0.749) and in the subscale scores for pain (p = 0.970), stiffness (p = 0.526), and physical functioning (p = 0.667) in month 12. The cost for single-dose injection was found to be approximately 30% lower compared to the repeated doses. CONCLUSION: These findings indicate that the single larger dose of GO-ON is as effective as the repeated doses over 12 months, and yet the total treatment cost is lowered.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Joelho / Ácido Hialurônico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Osteoartrite do Joelho / Ácido Hialurônico Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Health_economic_evaluation / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article