Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Assessment of biological dosimetric margin for stereotactic body radiation therapy.
Kawahara, Daisuke; Saito, Akito; Ozawa, Shuichi; Shiinoki, Takehiro; Kimura, Tomoki; Tsubouchi, Kento; Nagata, Yasushi.
Afiliação
  • Kawahara D; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Saito A; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Ozawa S; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Shiinoki T; Hiroshima High-Precision Radiotherapy Cancer Center, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Kimura T; Department of Radiation Oncology, Graduate School of Medicine, Yamaguchi University, Yamaguchi, Japan.
  • Tsubouchi K; Department of Radiation Oncology, Institute of Biomedical & Health Sciences, Hiroshima University, Hiroshima, Japan.
  • Nagata Y; Section of Radiation Therapy, Department of Clinical Support, Hiroshima University Hospital, Hiroshima, Japan.
J Appl Clin Med Phys ; 21(4): 31-41, 2020 Apr.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32141684
ABSTRACT

PURPOSE:

To develop a novel biological dosimetric margin (BDM) and to create a biological conversion factor (BCF) that compensates for the difference between physical dosimetric margin (PDM) and BDM, which provides a novel scheme of a direct estimation of the BDM from the physical dose (PD) distribution.

METHODS:

The offset to isocenter was applied in 1-mm steps along left-right (LR), anterior-posterior (AP), and cranio-caudal (CC) directions for 10 treatment plans of lung stereotactic body radiation therapy (SBRT) with a prescribed dose of 48 Gy. These plans were recalculated to biological equivalent dose (BED) by the linear-quadratic model for the dose per fraction (DPF) of d = 3-20 Gy/fr and α / ß = 3 - 10 . BDM and PDM were defined so that the region that satisfied that the dose covering 95% (or 98%) of the clinical target volume was greater than or equal to the 90% of the prescribed PD and BED, respectively. An empirical formula of the BCF was created as a function of the DPF.

RESULTS:

There was no significant difference between LR and AP directions for neither the PDM nor BDM. On the other hand, BDM and PDM in the CC direction were significantly larger than in the other directions. BCFs of D95% and D98% were derived for the transverse (LR and AP) and longitudinal (CC) directions.

CONCLUSIONS:

A novel scheme to directly estimate the BDM using the BCF was developed. This technique is expected to enable the BED-based SBRT treatment planning using PD-based treatment planning systems.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Dosagem Radioterapêutica / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radiocirurgia / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Radiometria / Dosagem Radioterapêutica / Planejamento da Radioterapia Assistida por Computador / Radiocirurgia / Radioterapia de Intensidade Modulada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article