Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Recognition of Common Non-Normal Walking Actions Based on Relief-F Feature Selection and Relief-Bagging-SVM.
Huang, Pan; Li, Yanping; Lv, Xiaoyi; Chen, Wen; Liu, Shuxian.
Afiliação
  • Huang P; College of Information Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China.
  • Li Y; College of Information Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China.
  • Lv X; College of Information Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China.
  • Chen W; College of Information Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China.
  • Liu S; College of Information Science and Engineering, Xinjiang University, Urumqi 830046, China.
Sensors (Basel) ; 20(5)2020 Mar 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32155811
ABSTRACT
Action recognition algorithms are widely used in the fields of medical health and pedestrian dead reckoning (PDR). The classification and recognition of non-normal walking actions and normal walking actions are very important for improving the accuracy of medical health indicators and PDR steps. Existing motion recognition algorithms focus on the recognition of normal walking actions, and the recognition of non-normal walking actions common to daily life is incomplete or inaccurate, resulting in a low overall recognition accuracy. This paper proposes a microelectromechanical system (MEMS) action recognition method based on Relief-F feature selection and relief-bagging-support vector machine (SVM). Feature selection using the Relief-F algorithm reduces the dimensions by 16 and reduces the optimization time by an average of 9.55 s. Experiments show that the improved algorithm for identifying non-normal walking actions has an accuracy of 96.63%; compared with Decision Tree (DT), it increased by 11.63%; compared with k-nearest neighbor (KNN), it increased by 26.62%; and compared with random forest (RF), it increased by 11.63%. The average Area Under Curve (AUC) of the improved algorithm improved by 0.1143 compared to KNN, by 0.0235 compared to DT, and by 0.04 compared to RF.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Caminhada / Máquina de Vetores de Suporte Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Caminhada / Máquina de Vetores de Suporte Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article