Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Is a Combination of the Serratus Intercostal Plane Block and Rectus Sheath Block Superior to the Bilateral Oblique Subcostal Transversus Abdominis Plane Block in Laparoscopic Cholecystectomy?
Selvi, Onur; Tulgar, Serkan; Senturk, Ozgur; Serifsoy, Talat Ercan; Thomas, David Terence; Deveci, Ugur; Ozer, Zeliha.
Afiliação
  • Selvi O; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Tulgar S; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Senturk O; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Serifsoy TE; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Thomas DT; Departments of Medical Education, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Deveci U; Department of General Surgery, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
  • Ozer Z; Department of Anesthesiology and Reanimation, Maltepe University School of Medicine, Istanbul, Turkey.
Eurasian J Med ; 52(1): 34-37, 2020 Feb.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32158311
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

The serratus intercostal plane block (SIPB) is a recently defined interfascial plane block. The oblique subcostal transversus abdominis plane block (OSTAP) is another type of interfascial plane block, and it is also used as a part of multimodal analgesia in patients undergoing laparoscopic cholecystectomy (LC). In this retrospective study, we evaluated the effects of the bilateral OSTAP and a combination of the right SIPB and bilateral rectus sheath block (RSB) on the postoperative pain and analgesia requirement in patients undergoing LC. MATERIALS AND

METHODS:

Data of the patients who underwent LC between May 2018 and November 2018 were evaluated retrospectively. Postoperative pain was evaluated using the numeric rating scale (NRS), and 24-hour tramadol consumption and rescue analgesia requirements were compared.

RESULTS:

Bilateral OSTAP was applied to 47 patients, and SIPB+RSB was applied to 25 patients. Postoperative pain scores were similar between the two groups. In the first 24 hours, tramadol requirement in the SIPB+RSB group was significantly lower than in the OSTAP block group (p<0.001). There was no statistically significant difference between the NRS averages at different time frames between the two block groups.

CONCLUSION:

We found that when SIPB is used as a part of multimodal analgesia in a combination with RSB in LS, it improves the quality of analgesia and decreases the analgesic requirement compared to patients undergoing a bilateral OSTAP block. Randomized controlled trials are necessary to compare the effects of SIPB alone and in a combination with other blocks in LC.
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Observational_studies Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article