Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment does not increase hemorrhagic adverse events during EUS-guided biliary drainage.
Ogura, Takeshi; Nishioka, Nobu; Ueno, Saori; Yamada, Tadahiro; Yamada, Masanori; Ueshima, Kazuya; Matsuno, Jun; Okuda, Atsushi; Yamamoto, Yoshitaro; Higuchi, Kazuhide.
Afiliação
  • Ogura T; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Nishioka N; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ueno S; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Yamada T; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Yamada M; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Ueshima K; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Matsuno J; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Okuda A; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Yamamoto Y; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
  • Higuchi K; 2nd Department of Internal Medicine, Osaka Medical College, Osaka, Japan.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 92(3): 659-666, 2020 Sep.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32334019
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

No data appear to have been reported regarding bleeding risk among patients receiving antiplatelet and/or anticoagulant treatment (AP/AC) during EUS-guided biliary drainage (BD) procedures. The aim of this study was to assess whether hemorrhagic adverse events associated with EUS-BD are increased in patients on AP/AC.

METHODS:

Patients receiving AP/AC who underwent EUS-BD were retrospectively enrolled between May 2015 and August 2019. Patients who did not receive AP/AC and underwent EUS-BD in the same period were also enrolled as a control group.

RESULTS:

One hundred ninety-five patients who underwent EUS-BD were enrolled in this study. Among these, 154 patients were allocated to the control group and 41 patients to the AP/AC group. Overall frequency of adverse events did not differ significantly between the control group (16.2%, 25/154) and AC/AP group (17.1%, 6/41; P = .80). The overall bleeding event rate was 3.6% (7/195), with no significant difference between the 2 groups. No thromboembolic events were observed with or without interruption of AP/AC. According to logistic regression analysis, the use of AP/AC was not a risk factor significantly associated with bleeding events (odds ratio, 2.96; 95% confidence interval, .56-14.0; P = .18). On the other hand, a long procedure time (>20 minutes) was an independent risk factor associated with bleeding events.

CONCLUSIONS:

Bleeding events appear to be infrequent among patients who undergo EUS-BD while continuing AP/AC.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endossonografia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Endossonografia Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article