Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Communication about Sexual Health in Breast Cancer: What Can We Learn from Patients' Self-Report and Clinic Dialogue?
Reese, Jennifer Barsky; Sorice, Kristen A; Zimmaro, Lauren A; Lepore, Stephen J; Beach, Mary Catherine.
Afiliação
  • Reese JB; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA. Electronic address: Jennifer.Reese@fccc.edu.
  • Sorice KA; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Zimmaro LA; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA.
  • Lepore SJ; Cancer Prevention and Control Program, Fox Chase Cancer Center, Philadelphia, PA, USA; Department of Social and Behavioral Sciences, College of Public Health, Temple University, Philadelphia, USA.
  • Beach MC; Department of Medicine, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore, USA.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(9): 1821-1829, 2020 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32349896
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

Research assessing clinical communication about sexual health is limited. We compared clinical communication about sexual health across patients' self-reports and coded dialogue in breast cancer outpatients.

METHODS:

134 patients had clinic visits audio-recorded and coded for sexual health communication and completed self-report questionnaires immediately after the visit. Associations between the self-report and dialogue were assessed using Phi coefficient. Agreements (present/absent) and discrepancies (omissions, commissions) about discussed topics were classified and discrepancies analyzed for themes.

RESULTS:

Sexual health was discussed in 61 of 134 patient visits (46%). Associations were significant (p < .01) but differed by topic (φ = .27-.76). 37 women (23%) had ≥ 1 self-report error. Discrepancies were common (19 omissions, 29 commissions). Patients often omitted communication about sexual concerns when such concerns were not problematic, and interpreted non-specific discussions as including specific topics of concern, even when not explicitly stated. Omissions were more common for women with lower education.

CONCLUSIONS:

Patients' reports of whether sexual health communication occurs does not always align with observed dialogue, and may vary by personal relevance of the topic. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS There are limitations in determining the prevalence of clinical communication about sexual health through patient self-report. Explaining sexual health terms might enhance shared understanding.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Médico-Paciente / Qualidade de Vida / Comportamento Sexual / Neoplasias da Mama / Parceiros Sexuais / Comunicação / Saúde Sexual Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Relações Médico-Paciente / Qualidade de Vida / Comportamento Sexual / Neoplasias da Mama / Parceiros Sexuais / Comunicação / Saúde Sexual Tipo de estudo: Qualitative_research / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article