Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Evaluation of first-person storytelling on changing health-related attitudes, knowledge, behaviors, and outcomes: A scoping review.
Lipsey, Amanda Faye; Waterman, Amy D; Wood, Emily H; Balliet, Wendy.
Afiliação
  • Lipsey AF; Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States; Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, United States. Electronic address: alipsey@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Waterman AD; Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States; Terasaki Institute for Biomedical Innovation, Los Angeles, United States. Electronic address: awaterman@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Wood EH; Division of Nephrology, David Geffen School of Medicine, University of California Los Angeles, Los Angeles, United States. Electronic address: ehwood@mednet.ucla.edu.
  • Balliet W; Medical University of South Carolina, Charleston, United States. Electronic address: ballietw@musc.edu.
Patient Educ Couns ; 103(10): 1922-1934, 2020 10.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32359877
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVES:

First-person storytelling (FPS) has the potential to engage patients in changing behavior differently than didactic education. We assessed the prevalence of FPS in health education interventions; whether published FPS research has shown improvements in attitudinal, knowledge, behavioral, or clinical outcomes; and whether randomized controlled trials (RCTs) including FPS have shown more effectiveness than non-FPS interventions.

METHODS:

A scoping review of FPS studies published before October 2019 in five medical databases was conducted.

RESULTS:

22 out of 10,363 identified studies met eligibility criteria. FPS has been studied primarily in cancer, diabetes, and hypertension. Of the 12 RCTs, compared to controls, patients receiving FPS interventions improved attitudes (N = 6 studies) and knowledge (N = 1), improved health behaviors like quitting smoking (N = 6), and improved clinical outcomes like lowering A1C levels (N = 3). Of the 10 non-RCT studies, compared to baseline assessments, patients who received FPS interventions had improved knowledge (N = 1), attitudes (N = 3), clinical outcomes (N = 4), and improved health behaviors (N = 7).

CONCLUSION:

While rarely used, FPS interventions can improve patient health attitudes and outcomes. Future research should expand FPS to new health areas and determine best practices for developing FPS interventions. PRACTICE IMPLICATIONS FPS may be particularly effective with low income patients and racial/ethnic minorities.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Comunicação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Comportamentos Relacionados com a Saúde / Conhecimentos, Atitudes e Prática em Saúde / Comunicação Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article