Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
New insights on missed colonic lesions during colonoscopy through artificial intelligence-assisted real-time detection (with video).
Lui, Thomas K L; Hui, Cynthia K Y; Tsui, Vivien W M; Cheung, Ka Shing; Ko, Michael K L; Foo, Dominic C C; Mak, Lung Yi; Yeung, Chung Kwong; Lui, Tim Hw; Wong, Siu Yin; Leung, Wai K.
Afiliação
  • Lui TKL; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Hui CKY; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Tsui VWM; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Cheung KS; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Ko MKL; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Foo DCC; Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Mak LY; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Yeung CK; Department of Surgery, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong; NISI (HK) Limited.
  • Lui TH; NISI (HK) Limited.
  • Wong SY; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
  • Leung WK; Department of Medicine, Queen Mary Hospital, University of Hong Kong, Hong Kong.
Gastrointest Endosc ; 93(1): 193-200.e1, 2021 01.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32376335
ABSTRACT
BACKGROUND AND

AIMS:

Meta-analysis shows that up to 26% of adenomas could be missed during colonoscopy. We investigated whether the use of artificial intelligence (AI)-assisted real-time detection could provide new insights into mechanisms underlying missed lesions during colonoscopy.

METHODS:

A validated real-time deep-learning AI model for the detection of colonic polyps was first tested in videos of tandem colonoscopy of the proximal colon for missed lesions. The real-time AI model was then prospectively validated in a total colonoscopy in which the endoscopist was blinded to real-time AI findings. Segmental unblinding of the AI findings were provided, and the colonic segment was then re-examined when missed lesions were detected by AI but not the endoscopist. All polyps were removed for histologic examination as the criterion standard.

RESULTS:

Sixty-five videos of tandem examination of the proximal colon were reviewed by AI. AI detected 79.1% (19/24) of missed proximal adenomas in the video of the first-pass examination. In 52 prospective colonoscopies, real-time AI detection detected at least 1 missed adenoma in 14 patients (26.9%) and increased the total number of adenomas detected by 23.6%. Multivariable analysis showed that a missed adenoma(s) was more likely when there were multiple polyps (adjusted odds ratio, 1.05; 95% confidence interval, 1.02-1.09; P < .0001) or colonoscopy was performed by less-experienced endoscopists (adjusted odds ratio, 1.30; 95% confidence interval, 1.05-1.62; P = .02).

CONCLUSIONS:

Our findings provide new insights on the prominent role of human factors, including inexperience and distraction, on missed colonic lesions. With the use of real-time AI assistance, up to 80% of missed adenomas could be prevented. (Clinical trial registration number NCT04227795.).
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenoma / Pólipos do Colo / Neoplasias do Colo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Adenoma / Pólipos do Colo / Neoplasias do Colo Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2021 Tipo de documento: Article