Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Combination of Foley and prostaglandins versus Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening: a network meta-analysis.
Orr, Lauren; Reisinger-Kindle, Keith; Roy, Amrita; Levine, Lisa; Connolly, Katherine; Visintainer, Paul; Schoen, Corina N.
Afiliação
  • Orr L; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts-Worcester, Worcester, MA.
  • Reisinger-Kindle K; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
  • Roy A; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
  • Levine L; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Pennsylvania, Philadelphia, PA.
  • Connolly K; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics, Gynecology and Reproductive Sciences, University of San Francisco, San Francisco, CA.
  • Visintainer P; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA.
  • Schoen CN; Division of Maternal-Fetal Medicine, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University of Massachusetts-Baystate, Springfield, MA. Electronic address: Corina.SchoenMD@baystatehealth.org.
Am J Obstet Gynecol ; 223(5): 743.e1-743.e17, 2020 11.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32387325
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

Trial and meta-analysis data revealed a reduction in time to delivery for Foley and prostaglandins or Foley and oxytocin vs Foley alone. However, there are limited data for the comparison of the 2 combination methods against each other.

OBJECTIVE:

This study aimed to determine whether Foley and prostaglandins or Foley and oxytocin decrease the time to vaginal delivery using a network meta-analysis. STUDY

DESIGN:

A network meta-analysis (PROSPERO CRD42018081948) was performed comparing Foley and prostaglandins (prostaglandin E1 or prostaglandin E2) vs Foley and oxytocin for cervical ripening. Foley alone and prostaglandins alone were used as nodes for indirect comparison. Database searches were performed from inception to March 2020 with data abstracted from published manuscripts. Eligibility criteria included randomized trials comparing Foley and oxytocin with Foley and prostaglandins (misoprostol or dinoprostone). Trials that compared Foley catheter or prostaglandins with a combination of Foley and prostaglandins or Foley and concurrent oxytocin were also included. Nulliparous and multiparous women were analyzed together. Foley catheters of any catheter material or size and >24 weeks' gestational age with a live fetus were included. Quasi-randomized, cohorts, and other combination methods for cervical ripening were not included. Prostaglandin E1 and prostaglandin E2 combined methods were analyzed separately in a planned subanalysis. The primary outcome was the mean time from induction to vaginal delivery in hours. Secondary outcomes included time from induction to delivery, delivery within 24 hours, cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, endometritis, epidural use, tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage, meconium, neonatal intensive care unit admission, and 5-minute appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration score of <7. Data were analyzed as a network meta-analysis using multivariate meta-regression.

RESULTS:

A total of 30 randomized controlled trials with a total of 6465 women were considered eligible for inclusion in this network meta-analysis. When compared with Foley alone, the use of Foley-oxytocin reduced the time to vaginal delivery by 4.2 hours (mean duration, -4.2 hours; 95% confidence interval, -6.5 to -1.9). Foley-prostaglandins reduced the time to vaginal delivery compared with Foley but did not meet statistical significance (mean duration, -2.9 hours; 95% confidence interval, -5.7 to 0.0; P=.05). When compared head-to-head, there was no difference in the time to vaginal delivery between Foley-prostaglandins and Foley-oxytocin (mean duration, 1.3 hours; 95% confidence interval, -2.0 to 4.7). There was no difference in the rate of cesarean delivery, chorioamnionitis, epidural, tachysystole, postpartum hemorrhage, meconium, neonatal intensive care unit admissions, or 5-minute appearance, pulse, grimace, activity, and respiration score of <7 for Foley-prostaglandins vs Foley-oxytocin, although the rate of endometritis was high for Foley-prostaglandins. In the subanalysis by prostaglandin type, there was no difference in the time to vaginal delivery for Foley-misoprostol vs Foley-dinoprostone vs Foley-oxytocin. However, Foley-dinoprostone had a definite trend toward longer time to all deliveries compared with that of both Foley-misoprostol and Foley-oxytocin (P=.05).

CONCLUSION:

Time to vaginal delivery was similar when comparing Foley with combined misoprostol, combined dinoprostone, and combined oxytocin. Dinoprostone comparisons are limited by small sample size but suggest longer time to delivery compared with Foley and misoprostol or oxytocin. No significant differences were observed in maternal or neonatal adverse events except for endometritis, but this was limited by the sample size, varied reporting of studies used in the indirect comparisons, and definitions of infectious morbidity use in the studies.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ocitócicos / Ocitocina / Dinoprostona / Colo do Útero / Misoprostol / Maturidade Cervical / Parto Obstétrico / Catéteres / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Ocitócicos / Ocitocina / Dinoprostona / Colo do Útero / Misoprostol / Maturidade Cervical / Parto Obstétrico / Catéteres / Trabalho de Parto Induzido Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Systematic_reviews Limite: Female / Humans / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article