Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Diagnostic Performance of PET or PET/CT with Different Radiotracers in Patients with Suspicious Lung Cancer or Pleural Tumours according to Published Meta-Analyses.
Lococo, Filippo; Muoio, Barbara; Chiappetta, Marco; Nachira, Dania; Petracca Ciavarella, Leonardo; Margaritora, Stefano; Treglia, Giorgio.
Afiliação
  • Lococo F; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Muoio B; Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Chiappetta M; Clinic of Oncology, Oncology Institute of Southern Switzerland, Ente Ospedaliero Cantonale, Bellinzona, Switzerland.
  • Nachira D; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Petracca Ciavarella L; Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
  • Margaritora S; Università Cattolica del Sacro Cuore, Rome, Italy.
  • Treglia G; Thoracic Surgery, Fondazione Policlinico Universitario A. Gemelli IRCCS, Rome, Italy.
Contrast Media Mol Imaging ; 2020: 5282698, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32405280
ABSTRACT

Purpose:

Several meta-analyses have reported data about the diagnostic performance of positron emission tomography or positron emission tomography/computed tomography (PET or PET/CT) with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious lung cancer (LC) or pleural tumours (PT). This review article aims at providing an overview on the recent evidence-based data in this setting.

Methods:

A comprehensive literature search of meta-analyses published in PubMed/MEDLINE and Cochrane Library database from January 2010 through March 2020 about the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with different radiotracers in patients with suspicious LC or PT was performed. This combination of keywords was used (A) "PET" OR "positron emission tomography" AND (B) "lung" OR "pulmonary" OR "pleur∗" AND (C) meta-analysis. Only meta-analyses on PET or PET/CT in patients with suspicious LC or PT were selected.

Results:

We have summarized the diagnostic performance of PET or PET/CT with fluorine-18 fluorodeoxyglucose (18F-FDG) and other radiotracers taking into account 17 meta-analyses. Evidence-based data demonstrated a good diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET or PET/CT for the characterization of solitary pulmonary nodules (SPNs) or pleural lesions with overall higher sensitivity than specificity. Evidence-based data do not support the routine use of dual time point (DTP) 18F-FDG PET/CT or fluorine-18 fluorothymidine (18F-FLT) PET/CT in the differential diagnosis of SPNs. Even if 18F-FDG PET/CT has high sensitivity and specificity as a selective screening modality for LC, its role in this setting remains unknown.

Conclusions:

Evidence-based data about the diagnostic performance of PET/CT with different radiotracers for suspicious LC or PT are increasing, with good diagnostic performance of 18F-FDG PET/CT. More prospective multicenter studies and cost-effectiveness analyses are warranted.
Assuntos

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pleurais / Metanálise como Assunto / Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Neoplasias Pleurais / Metanálise como Assunto / Compostos Radiofarmacêuticos / Tomografia por Emissão de Pósitrons combinada à Tomografia Computadorizada / Neoplasias Pulmonares Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Diagnostic_studies / Screening_studies / Systematic_reviews Limite: Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article