Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Efficacy and adherence of sublingual immunotherapy in patients aged 60 to 75 years old with house dust mite-induced allergic rhinitis.
Chen, Hong; Chen, Yong; Lin, Biyu; Huang, Shaopeng; Liu, Qinhua; Zheng, Hao; Li, Ruiyu.
Afiliação
  • Chen H; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
  • Chen Y; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
  • Lin B; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
  • Huang S; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
  • Liu Q; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
  • Zheng H; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China.
  • Li R; Department of Otorhinolaryngology, Fujian Provincial Hospital, Fuzhou 350001, China. Electronic address: liruiyu_phd@163.com.
Am J Otolaryngol ; 41(4): 102538, 2020.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32451288
PURPOSE: This study aimed to evaluate the efficacy and adherence of sublingual immunotherapy (SLIT) for house dust mite (HDM)-induced allergic rhinitis (AR) patients over 60 years old. MATERIALS AND METHODS: Eighty-six AR patients aged 60-75 years old were randomly divided in the control and treatment group as 1:1 ratio. The control group was treated with standard pharmacotherapy while the treatment group was treated with SLIT plus pharmacotherapy on demand. Patients adherence, combined symptom and medication score (CSMS), visual analog scale (VAS), and presence of adverse events were evaluated in the baseline and after 6-months, 12-months and 24-months treatment. RESULTS: Twenty-five (58.1%) subjects in the treatment group and 20 (46.5%) subjects in the control group completed the study (P > 0.05). The major reasons for premature cessation were out of touch and relieved symptoms. At the same time, CSMS and VAS of the patients over 60 years old in both groups significantly decreased from baseline to any post-baseline time point (all P < 0.05). The comparison of CSMS and VAS between the two groups revealed statistically significant differences in favor of the SLIT group at month 24 (P < 0.05), whereas no differences at month 6 and month 12 (all P > 0.05). CONCLUSION: 41.9% of the patients dropped out within 2 years of SLIT treatment and the major reasons for premature cessation were out of touch and relieved symptoms. This study suggested that SLIT plus pharmacotherapy provided a greater clinical benefit than pharmacotherapy alone at two years.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento / Cooperação do Paciente / Pyroglyphidae / Adesão à Medicação / Imunoterapia Sublingual / Rinite Alérgica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Pacientes Desistentes do Tratamento / Cooperação do Paciente / Pyroglyphidae / Adesão à Medicação / Imunoterapia Sublingual / Rinite Alérgica Tipo de estudo: Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Aged / Animals / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article