Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Imperfect transparency and camouflage in glass frogs.
Barnett, James B; Michalis, Constantine; Anderson, Hannah M; McEwen, Brendan L; Yeager, Justin; Pruitt, Jonathan N; Scott-Samuel, Nicholas E; Cuthill, Innes C.
Afiliação
  • Barnett JB; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada; barnettj@mcmaster.ca.
  • Michalis C; School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1TQ Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • Anderson HM; School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, BS8 1TQ Bristol, United Kingdom.
  • McEwen BL; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
  • Yeager J; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
  • Pruitt JN; Biodiversidad Medio Ambiente y Salud, Universidad de Las Américas, 170125 Quito, Ecuador.
  • Scott-Samuel NE; Department of Psychology, Neuroscience & Behaviour, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON L8S 4K1, Canada.
  • Cuthill IC; School of Psychological Science, University of Bristol, BS8 1TU Bristol, United Kingdom.
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A ; 117(23): 12885-12890, 2020 06 09.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32457164
ABSTRACT
Camouflage patterns prevent detection and/or recognition by matching the background, disrupting edges, or mimicking particular background features. In variable habitats, however, a single pattern cannot match all available sites all of the time, and efficacy may therefore be reduced. Active color change provides an alternative where coloration can be altered to match local conditions, but again efficacy may be limited by the speed of change and range of patterns available. Transparency, on the other hand, creates high-fidelity camouflage that changes instantaneously to match any substrate but is potentially compromised in terrestrial environments where image distortion may be more obvious than in water. Glass frogs are one example of terrestrial transparency and are well known for their transparent ventral skin through which their bones, intestines, and beating hearts can be seen. However, sparse dorsal pigmentation means that these frogs are better described as translucent. To investigate whether this imperfect transparency acts as camouflage, we used in situ behavioral trials, visual modeling, and laboratory psychophysics. We found that the perceived luminance of the frogs changed depending on the immediate background, lowering detectability and increasing survival when compared to opaque frogs. Moreover, this change was greatest for the legs, which surround the body at rest and create a diffuse transition from background to frog luminance rather than a sharp, highly salient edge. This passive change in luminance, without significant modification of hue, suggests a camouflage strategy, "edge diffusion," distinct from both transparency and active color change.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anuros / Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos / Pigmentação da Pele / Adaptação Biológica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Anuros / Reconhecimento Visual de Modelos / Pigmentação da Pele / Adaptação Biológica Tipo de estudo: Prognostic_studies Limite: Animals / Humans Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article