Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Endometrial scratch vs no intervention in egg donation cycles: the ENDOSCRATCH trial protocol.
Izquierdo, Alexandra; de la Fuente, Laura; Spies, Katharina; Rayward, Jennifer; López, Lourdes; Lora, David; Galindo, Alberto.
Afiliação
  • Izquierdo A; ProcreaTec Fertility Clinic, Madrid, Spain. izquierdo.alexandra@yahoo.es.
  • de la Fuente L; Human Reproduction Unit, Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology, University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Spies K; ProcreaTec Fertility Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rayward J; ProcreaTec Fertility Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
  • López L; ProcreaTec Fertility Clinic, Madrid, Spain.
  • Lora D; Clinical Research Unit (imas12-CIBERESP). University Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Galindo A; Fetal Medicine Unit - Maternal and Child Health and Development Network (Red SAMID-RD12/0026/0016). Department of Obstetrics and Gynecology. University Hospital 12 de Octubre. 12 de Octubre Research Institute (imas12), Complutense University of Madrid, Madrid, Spain.
BMC Pregnancy Childbirth ; 20(1): 333, 2020 May 30.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32473654
ABSTRACT

BACKGROUND:

The effects of endometrial scratching (ES) on embryo implantation have been studied for many years. Several studies have shown better outcomes when performed on patients undergoing intrauterine insemination and in vitro fertilization (IVF) cycles, but many other reports have not been able to find these differences. As far as cycles with donor eggs are concerned, reported evidence is scarce. Our aim in this trial is to determine if ES is useful for those patients undergoing IVF cycles with donor eggs, in order to assure a greater homogeneity in embryo quality and endometrial preparation.

METHODS:

This single centre randomized controlled trial will include patients undergoing an egg donation cycle, meeting the inclusion criteria and who accept to participate in the study. Once informed consent is signed, patients will be randomly allocated to the study arm (group A) and then receive ES in the luteal phase of the cycle prior to embryo transfer, or the control arm (group B) without any intervention. All cycle data will be collected and analyzed to obtain the clinical pregnancy and the live birth rates in the two groups.

DISCUSSION:

Several studies have tried to determine the effectiveness of an ES in IVF cycles, but it is still unclear due to the heterogeneity of these reports. The aim of this study is to determine if there are differences in clinical pregnancy rate and live birth rate in egg donor cycles, when comparing an ES performed in the preceding luteal phase versus no intervention, given that embryo quality and endometrial preparation protocols will be comparable. TRIAL REGISTRATION Ethical approval of version 2.0 of this trial was obtained on the 13th January 2017. It was retrospectively registered on the 5th April 2017 as the ENDOSCRATCH Trial (NCT03108157) in ClinicalTrials.gov.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantação do Embrião / Fertilização in vitro / Coeficiente de Natalidade / Transferência Embrionária / Endométrio / Nascido Vivo / Fase Luteal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Implantação do Embrião / Fertilização in vitro / Coeficiente de Natalidade / Transferência Embrionária / Endométrio / Nascido Vivo / Fase Luteal Tipo de estudo: Clinical_trials / Guideline / Observational_studies / Prognostic_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Female / Humans / Middle aged / Pregnancy Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article