Your browser doesn't support javascript.
loading
Effectiveness and safety of perampanel monotherapy for focal and generalized tonic-clonic seizures: Experience from a national multicenter registry.
Toledano Delgado, Rafael; García-Morales, Irene; Parejo-Carbonell, Beatriz; Jiménez-Huete, Adolfo; Herrera-Ramirez, David; González-Hernández, Ayoze; Ayuga Loro, Fernando; Santamarina, Estevo; Toledo, Manuel; Ojeda, Joaquín; Poza, Juan José; Molins, Albert; Giner, Pau; Estévez María, José Carlos; Castro-Vilanova, María Dolores; Zurita, Jorge; Saiz-Diaz, Rosa Ana; Gómez-Ibañez, Asier; Rodriguez-Uranga, Juan; Gil-Nagel, Antonio; Campos, Dulce; Sánchez-Larsen, Álvaro; Aguilar-Amat Prior, Maria José; Mauri Llerda, José Angel; Huertas González, Nuria; García-Barragán, Nuria.
Afiliação
  • Toledano Delgado R; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Ramón y Cajal, Madrid, Spain.
  • García-Morales I; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
  • Parejo-Carbonell B; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
  • Jiménez-Huete A; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • Herrera-Ramirez D; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico San Carlos, Madrid, Spain.
  • González-Hernández A; Neurology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
  • Ayuga Loro F; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
  • Santamarina E; Neurology Department, Hospital San Roque Las Palmas, Las Palmas de Gran Canaria, Spain.
  • Toledo M; Neurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Toledo, Toledo, Spain.
  • Ojeda J; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Poza JJ; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Vall d´Hebron, Barcelona, Spain.
  • Molins A; Neurology Department, Hospital Infanta Sofía, Madrid, Spain.
  • Giner P; Neurology Department, Hospital Donostia, San Sebastian, Spain.
  • Estévez María JC; Neurology Department, Hospital Josep Trueta, Girona, Spain.
  • Castro-Vilanova MD; Neurology Department, Hospital Dr. Peset, Valencia, Spain.
  • Zurita J; Neurology Department, Hospital Reina Sofía, Cordoba, Spain.
  • Saiz-Diaz RA; Neurology Department, Hospital Álvaro Cunqueiro, Vigo, Spain.
  • Gómez-Ibañez A; Neurology Department, Hospital Infanta Leonor, Madrid, Spain.
  • Rodriguez-Uranga J; Neurology Department, Hospital 12 de Octubre, Madrid, Spain.
  • Gil-Nagel A; Neurology Department, Clínica Universitaria de Navarra, Madrid, Spain.
  • Campos D; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Centro de Neurología Avanzada, Seville, Spain.
  • Sánchez-Larsen Á; Epilepsy Unit, Neurology Department, Hospital Ruber Internacional, Madrid, Spain.
  • Aguilar-Amat Prior MJ; Neurology Department, Hospital Clínico de Valladolid, Valladolid, Spain.
  • Mauri Llerda JA; Neurology Department, Complejo Hospitalario de Albacete, Albacete, Spain.
  • Huertas González N; Neurology Department, Hospital La Paz, Madrid, Spain.
  • García-Barragán N; Neurology Department, Hospital Lozano Blesa, Zaragoza, Spain.
Epilepsia ; 61(6): 1109-1119, 2020 06.
Article em En | MEDLINE | ID: mdl-32511754
ABSTRACT

OBJECTIVE:

To assess the effectiveness and tolerability of perampanel (PER) monotherapy in routine clinical practice for the treatment of focal onset and generalized tonic-clonic seizures (GTCS).

METHODS:

This multicenter, retrospective, observational study was conducted in patients aged ≥12 years treated with PER as primary monotherapy or converted to PER monotherapy by progressive reduction of background antiepileptic drugs. Outcomes included retention, responder, and seizure-free rate after 3, 6, and 12 months and tolerability throughout the follow-up.

RESULTS:

A total of 98 patients (mean age = 49.6 ± 21.7 years, 51% female) with focal seizures and/or GTCS were treated with PER monotherapy for a median exposure of 14 months (range = 1-57) with a median dose of 4 mg (range = 2-10). The retention rates at 3, 6, and 12 months and last follow-up were 93.8%, 89.3%, 80.9%, and 71.4%, respectively. The retention rates according to the type of monotherapy (primary vs conversion) did not differ (log-rank P value = .57). Among the 98 patients, 61.2% patients had seizures throughout the baseline period, with a median seizure frequency of 0.6 seizures per month (range = 0.3-26). Responder rates at 3, 6, and 12 months were 79.6%, 70.1%, and 52.8%, respectively, and seizure freedom rates at the same points were 62.7%, 56.1%, and 41.5%. Regarding the 33 patients who had GTCS in the baseline period, 87.8% were seizure-free at 3 months, 78.1% at 6 months, and 55.1% at 12 months. Over the entire follow-up, PER monotherapy was generally well tolerated, and only 16% of patients discontinued PER due to adverse events (AEs). Female patients were found to be at a higher risk of psychiatric AEs (female vs male odds ratio = 2.85, 95% confidence interval = 1-8.33, P = .046).

SIGNIFICANCE:

PER demonstrated good effectiveness and a good safety profile when used as primary therapy or conversion to monotherapy at relatively low doses, in a clinical setting with patients with focal seizures and GTCS.
Assuntos
Palavras-chave

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piridonas / Convulsões / Sistema de Registros / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article

Texto completo: 1 Base de dados: MEDLINE Assunto principal: Piridonas / Convulsões / Sistema de Registros / Anticonvulsivantes Tipo de estudo: Diagnostic_studies / Observational_studies / Risk_factors_studies Limite: Adolescent / Adult / Aged / Aged80 / Female / Humans / Male / Middle aged Idioma: En Ano de publicação: 2020 Tipo de documento: Article